Verified Reviews - Analytica Chimica Acta
黑黑不是嘿嘿 2023-08-09
Return and receive in one day for repairs, comfortable! Congratulations! If the editor still ignores my RRC this week, I plan to send a reminder letter.
uhfiuayhf 2023-08-09
It might be related to the editor. I accepted it as soon as I went back for one day.
黑黑不是嘿嘿 2023-08-08
Hmm... it's possible. Haha, maybe I'm the one who lengthens the average review time.
uhfiuayhf 2023-08-08
Has the RRC time changed? It is possible that the third reviewer has not yet returned their comments.
黑黑不是嘿嘿 2023-08-08
It has been two weeks, but the time hasn't changed at all. Ah, so much vicissitudes.
uhfiuayhf 2023-07-31
I waited for two weeks before receiving a decision. It was indeed quite slow.
黑黑不是嘿嘿 2023-07-31
The processing speed is so slow, it's driving me crazy. It feels like I'm moving at a turtle's pace. I also submitted a 5.9 rating, but now it's been 1 week since the required reviews were completed and the status hasn't been updated.
xxw2020 2023-07-31
5.9 Submission
6.3 Two reviewers' comments are positive, providing 18 suggestions, recommending resubmission after revisions.
6.23 Resubmission
7.16 External review completed, minor revisions (provided 42 days).
7.25 Minor revisions submitted
7.30 Accept
uhfiuayhf 2023-07-27
Yes, yes. I feel that the reviewers and editors are very kind. The editor directly made the modifications and accepted them.
luna199 2023-07-27
Congratulations! I hope you receive good luck.
uhfiuayhf 2023-07-27
Gave suggestions for major repairs.
susummy199 2023-07-27
I guess the results will be out soon, right? I also applied for ACA. The reviews from 25 peers have returned, and the required reviews have been completed. I hope it's a good outcome...
uhfiuayhf 2023-07-27
After half a month of completion, the submission processed suddenly became 0. Is this a system freeze?
uhfiuayhf 2023-07-26
My ninth number became "competed" and then it was updated once on the 13th, but it still hasn't changed until now.
Ymg! 2023-07-26
Has your current state changed? This has been my state since the two reviewers finished reviewing on the 18th. It hasn't changed until now.
uhfiuayhf 2023-07-16
The translation of the text is: "Required reviews completed, status unchanged, but the time has changed. What is the situation?"
uhfiuayhf 2023-07-14
After four days of continuous reviews, the time has changed. How long will it approximately take to have a decision?
哇,是黑黑呀 2023-07-04
【Research Novice】Alright, thank you very much~ Then I will give it a try as well.
科研小白兔 2023-06-28
What we do is also optical and electrical sensing for disease detection. The usual submission order is AC, BB, ACS sensor, sensor b, ACA, talanta.
哇,是黑黑呀 2023-06-27
【Research Newbie】Ah~ no, this is last year's article. It was just bad luck last year, but this year will definitely be better. Recently, I'm considering submitting an article on optical sensor detection of disease markers. Can you recommend a few journals with faster review processes, preferably higher than ACA?
科研小白兔 2023-06-20
This thing really depends on luck. In our research group, we have submitted several papers to ACA. Basically, it takes about one month to receive the review results, and then another half a month to make revisions and accept them. I feel like the original poster has bad luck.
哇,是黑黑呀 2023-06-14
2022.11.11 submit
2022.11.12 with editor (under review on the same day)
Then began the long road
2023.01.10 reminder sent
2023.01.11 updated the under review time
2023.02.02 major revision with 3 reviewers, 1 direct acceptance, 2 modifications
2023.02.26 returned
2023.03.28 minor revision, mainly addressing grammar issues raised by one reviewer who felt I didn't make significant changes
2023.04.19 returned
Long waiting
2023.06.10 directly accepted and formatted
2023.06.11 online publication
In total, it took 7 months. Fortunately, I hadn't reached my graduation deadline, otherwise I wouldn't have been able to keep up. Our group submitted 3 papers to this journal, none of which took less than four months. If you're in a hurry to graduate, be cautious. I am in the field of spectroscopy.
成晓东 2023-05-08
2023.2.20 - First submission. On the 22nd, it was under review. Six reviewers were requested. After one week, three reviewers accepted the review. On March 18th, the completion of reviews was requested. On March 20th, the reviews were completed. The three reviewers had different opinions - one gave a positive review, one thought it had novelty but was not complete enough, and one believed it lacked innovation and comparative experiments. The editor was friendly, rejected the submission but encouraged resubmission after modifications. After making the modifications, it was resubmitted on April 10th. On the 13th, it was under review again, with three reviewers requested (not sure if they were the same as the previous ones). Two reviewers accepted the review. On May 5th, the completion of reviews was required. On May 8th, the review comments came back, but only one reviewer's opinion was received (they thought the modifications were good). The editor sent an acceptance email. Before being accepted by ACA, it had also been rejected several times, and the process was difficult and torturous. Fortunately, it was eventually accepted.
龟龟1219 2023-05-07
The second review has been completed for a month... The opinions from the two reviewers should have come back by now, but I don't know if I should pressurize and urge the submission. I'm in a dilemma... It's my first time submitting this, any good suggestions?... Praying for good luck, hahaha.
笙歌十里 2023-04-07
Come, come, come, I finally got a paper accepted and I want to share the good news with everyone.
Submitted on February 15, 2023.
With editor on February 15, 2023.
Waited for half a month, then urged for the manuscript, and then urged for the submission.
Under review on February 28, 2023.
Required reviews complete on March 12, 2023.
The feedback was minor revisions, which were accepted after making the changes.
Revised with editor on March 18, 2023.
Changed the date with editor on March 20, 2023.
Then came the long wait again, and I couldn't bear it anymore, so I urged for the manuscript.
Under review on April 5, 2023.
Required reviews complete on April 6, 2023.
Accepted on April 7, 2023.
In short, the reviewers were very efficient this time. I have been rejected before, but this time I combined deep learning with online detection, and the reviewers liked it very much. This journal is good. Finally, I have published my first paper in a top-tier journal. I will continue to work hard.
笙歌十里 2023-04-04
I've been back for 17 days, still with the editor. Ah, I'm really worried.
独行侠 2023-04-04
There shouldn't be any, anyway after a few days just directly accept, didn't pay attention to whether the status has changed or not.
笙歌十里 2023-04-03
Just asking, @独行侠, did you submit it for review after working with the editor?
chesto36 2023-03-01
2022.12.5 Submission
2023.2.28 Rejected
Too slow, it wastes time.
笙歌十里 2023-02-24
Just asking, is your recent submission process slow? I submitted with an editor on the 15th, and it is still with the editor today. Are you experiencing the same speed?
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started