吉拉嘎嘎 2022-10-17

Hello, I would like to ask if this magazine requires a layout fee.

文章小白 2022-10-13

May I ask how long the status "manuscript submitted" will be maintained after you submit it? It has been three days since I submitted, and the status hasn't changed yet.

加德满都的风铃 2022-06-22

Submitted in February, returned for repairs at the end of April, major modifications. It was just submitted today. Borrowing the luck of the original poster, hope it will win.

W.J. James WU 2022-05-03

2022.04.25 Minor Revision, R1 said Most of my suggestions from the first version have been addressed, and provided three minor points for modification, and gave Publish After Revisions. No R2 was submitted. R3 said I thank the authors for considering our recommendations to develop the manuscript. The changes made to the manuscript are adequate. Gave Publish As Is
2022.04.28 Submitted revised manuscript for Minor Revision (1 day later, the status immediately changed from manuscript submitted to With Editor).
2022.05.02 Accepted.

W.J. James WU 2022-05-03

The following text is translated into English:

In addition, the editor provided a few small comments.
On March 14, 2022, the revised manuscript for Major Revision was submitted (several days later, the status changed from "manuscript submitted" to "under review"). I answered the questions from R1, R2, R3, and the editor one by one. Because the length of the article exceeded the page limit for a Research Note by 2 pages, it should technically be submitted as an article. However, R1 suggested submitting it as a Research Note. Therefore, in the message box to the editor, I asked if they could provide a suggestion on which format to submit.
On April 16, 2022, the required reviews were completed.

W.J. James WU 2022-05-03

2021.12.15 First submission.
2022.02.14 Major Revision, with three reviewers (hereinafter referred to as R1, R2, R3).
R1 found it interesting and raised a major concern, stating that the research subject is not representative enough in the field, thus suggesting to change it to a Research Note. R1 provided 12 specific comments and recommended significant revisions.
R2 commented that the writing was good and provided 10 detailed comments, suggesting minor revisions.
R3 also acknowledged the researchers' effort in studying ×××× and raised three major concerns. The first concern is similar to R1's, questioning the representativeness of the research subject. The second concern is about the complete absence of statistical analysis (although we actually conducted it, just did not describe it in detail). The third concern asks whether we conducted a cost-benefit analysis.

JI wang 2021-04-09

As long as the direction is right, the speed is super fast. But mine is a major overhaul.