Verified Reviews - JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

lapulasi 2023-06-20

2023.02.20 manuscript submitted
2023.02.20 with journal administrator
2023.03.01 with editor
2023.04.15 out for review
2023.06.17 decision pending

Translation:
2023.02.20 - Manuscript submitted
2023.02.20 - With journal administrator
2023.03.01 - With editor
2023.04.15 - Out for review
2023.06.17 - Decision pending

2023-05-22

After minor revision, the manuscript was rejected. Isn't this too outrageous? Did you not answer the reviewer's questions properly? Or did you evade the questions?

Taylor 2023-05-22

Posted on August 15, 2022.
Minor revision on March 18, 2023.
Rejected after minor revision on April 29, 2023.
A year of struggle, lessons learned through blood and tears. Careful consideration.

Roderick 2023-05-19

You are really fast at this. It has been 5 months since I submitted my opinion, and I haven't received any feedback yet. I have been waiting for so long that even the flowers have withered. This is too slow, and the submission system is really rubbish.

2023-05-18

I submitted on March 16th, and received feedback from the editor 10 days later. On May 11th, I received comments from two reviewers. The problem is that I haven't found specific comments from reviewer 1 in the email or the system. They only provided a general evaluation and mentioned the need for major revisions, along with a comment list. I have been unable to locate the specific comments. I emailed them, but haven't received a response. By the way, this system is really poorly designed, much worse than Elsevier and Springer's EM systems.

Roderick 2023-05-07

May I ask if you have received any feedback on your manuscript? It has been over four months for mine, and I still haven't received any feedback.

2023-05-03

There was a decision pending in the middle, and then it was out for review. I want to ask, what are the final opinions that came back? Is there one of them that is not good?

Roderick 2023-04-22

You are quite fast with this. Mine has been 4 months already, and there is still no feedback from the first trial. I have been waiting for so long that even the flowers have withered.

sxbjlj 2023-04-22

Posted on January 5, 2023, no movement, major revision on April 7, 2023, then quickly
March 11, 2023
With Editor
April 7, 2023
Out for Review
April 7, 2023
Decision Pending
April 7, 2023
Revision Required
April 13, 2023
Revision Incomplete
April 13, 2023
Revised Manuscript Submitted
April 13, 2023
With Journal Administrator
April 17, 2023
With Editor
April 18, 2023
Out for Review
April 18, 2023
Decision Pending
April 21, 2023
Accepted

Roderick 2023-04-14

I submitted it on 12.24, and the review period has been changed twice, on 01.06 and 02.23. Still no news, it's quite slow.

投就完事了呢 2023-04-13

Received the results on 10th April 2023. One minor revision and one rejection. The reviewer admitted to only reading the introduction and provided comments that were deemed unnecessary. They even claimed that the line numbers and text in each line did not match, which is frustrating. Ultimately, the editor gave a rejection.

Roderick 2023-04-11

Good luck! I still haven't received the review result, so I can only wait patiently.

Taylor 2023-04-11

The first instance opinion came out on March 18th, and we just submitted the response to the opinions today (April 11th). Looking forward to the results.

Roderick 2023-04-07

It has been 3 months since the first review, and I haven't received any comments yet. It is really slow. I hope the results can be processed quickly, even if it is a rejection, it would be better to know sooner. This delay is really causing inconvenience.

投就完事了呢 2023-04-05

2022.12.28 submit
2023.1.5 The editor suggested that I add a section on calculation-related content.
2023.1.21 resubmit
2023.1.23 under review
2023.3.18 under review, probably found new reviewers
2023.4.4 decision pending, under review again on the same day
Overall, it feels a bit slow compared to the speed of those structural field journals in Elsevier. I can only pray for a good outcome.

Roderick 2023-03-23

The information found on the official website is as follows:
Speed/acceptance
120 days on average from submission to first decision
139 days on average from submission to first post-review decision
15 days on average from acceptance to online publication
35% acceptance rate

Roderick 2023-03-23

It seems that this journal is generally slow. If you are in a hurry, you should ask quickly.

lapulasi 2023-03-23

It has been over a month since the submission, and it is still "with editor". Should I send an email to inquire about it?

Roderick 2023-03-22

If you can't wait, just ask. Mine was updated with the review time last month, and it's been exactly a month now, but still no news.

论文不怕多 2023-03-21

Me too, should I send an email and ask?

lapulasi 2023-03-20

Submission of the manuscript is exactly one month...

Roderick 2023-03-15

It has been 3 months, and still no news. It's really slow.

Roderick 2023-03-15

Hurry and ask, is it still in the "Out for Review" status?

Taylor 2023-03-14

Mid-August 2022 submission
Mid-November 2022 review submission

No results yet... Waiting, it's too slow, really anxious waiting, should I ask the editorial department about the situation? Please advise, experts.

Roderick 2023-03-09

It is possible that the opinions of the reviewers are conflicting, so the responsible editor of the manuscript decides to find another reviewer for arbitration. After considering the opinions of the additional reviewer, a final decision on the manuscript will be made.

论文不怕多 2023-03-09

Hello, are the two external reviews due to experts rejecting the submission?

论文不怕多 2023-03-09

I have also encountered this situation. There were two external reviews, and one expert rejected the manuscript. Then the editor had to find a third person.

论文不怕多 2023-03-09

I encountered this situation twice during the external audits. What happened?

拉普拉斯 2023-03-02

2023.02.20 Manuscript Submitted
2023.02.20 With Journal Administrator
2023.03.01 With Editor

Translation:
2023.02.20 Manuscript Submitted
2023.02.20 With Journal Administrator
2023.03.01 With Editor

Roderick 2023-03-01

I have not received the review results yet, so I am not sure how many reviewers there are.

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started