Verified Reviews - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
fulu 2022-07-06
There are three reviewers with a total of 17 comments, but they are all quite positive and minor issues. It is currently under review.
cqupH 2022-07-06
6.5 Submission
6.21 First review comments are out
Revised on 6.27
Accepted on 7.5
不够丿纯 2022-07-06
This year, the speed of this journal is a bit slow. It has been 10 days with the editor, which I have never encountered before.
MAZNE 2022-07-04
Distant and indefinite, the 34th day...
Renee丶W 2022-06-27
2022.4.8 Submission
2022.4.16 Under review
2022.5.25 Minor revisions
2022.6.14 Submitted after modifications
2022.6.16 Under review
2022.6.23 Accepted
It is the fastest journal response I have received for my submission. I had submitted another article earlier and after nine months of being under review, it was rejected...
小可keyan 2022-06-26
It has been a month for me.
MAZNE 2022-06-25
Translate the following text into English: with editor on the 26th day
MAZNE 2022-06-25
Day 26 with editor!!!! I will not submit to this journal again until I graduate with a doctorate.
luolong 2022-06-22
4.28 submission, received feedback after 50 days, still no outcome.
顶刊手子 2022-06-22
May I ask how many review comments there are?
MAZNE 2022-06-21
I have been with the editor for 22 days, scary!!!
小可keyan 2022-06-18
Does it skip the "under review" stage and go straight to providing feedback after the editor?
小可keyan 2022-06-18
Did you give feedback directly after the editor? Is it not under review yet?
fulu 2022-06-18
3-1-Submission
3-22-With editor
5-26-Returned with minor revisions
6-3-Submitted revised manuscript
6-8-Under review
6-11-Required reviews completed
6-16-Accepted
jz_c 2022-06-17
6.14 submitted for review, after 22 days of with editor.
PEMFC 2022-06-16
5.16 submission, it has been a month and it is still under review.
Does this journal take so long to review manuscripts?
maoly 2022-06-16
It has been two months already and I haven't received any feedback on the manuscript yet.
小可keyan 2022-06-13
It's inexplicable. Is this the result given after a month of editing?
小可keyan 2022-06-13
Incomprehensible, does it take a month to get the editing results?
ZZliver 2022-06-13
The text translates to: "The article is about electrocatalytic ORROER and zinc-air batteries. The editor rejected it directly, stating that the journal does not accept articles on zinc-air batteries. However, it is interesting because this journal has already published more than ten articles on zinc-air batteries this year."
jz_c 2022-06-12
I haven't written a reminder letter, and I'm worried that not doing so might become a reason for rejection. However, I have still been in the "with editor" status.
jz_c 2022-06-12
Not writing a reminder letter, I worry that it might become a reason for rejection directly, but still in a state of being with the editor.
小可keyan 2022-06-12
Is there any movement?
木子亘 2022-06-11
I wrote a reminder letter stating that there were issues with the Highlights written by Highlights, but they have not provided any feedback and I have been waiting for two months. The magazine requires individual highlights of 125 words, while the official website requires highlights of 85 bytes per line. The revised version has been sent for the third review, and as of now, the review process for 608 is completed, but the final decision has not been received yet.
MAZNE 2022-06-10
Write a reminder letter. It's been too long.
jinzhou_chen 2022-06-09
Posted on May 18th, it has been silent since the 22nd when it was with the editor. The status has not changed and the editor has not submitted it for review. What should I do?
MAZNE 2022-06-09
I'm sorry, but your text is incomplete. Please provide the full text you would like to have translated into English.
MAZNE 2022-06-09
It feels like it's been over 14 days, so it's time to remind them.
jinzhou_chen 2022-06-09
My with editor has been 21 days.
小可keyan 2022-06-08
My 14 days have passed.
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started