HemeH 2022-05-22

The initial review is slow, and it still can't enter the review stage after two months.

HemeH 2022-05-12

May 12th, the status once again returns to awaiting reviewer selection.

HemeH 2022-05-06

Always editing in hand.

HemeH 2022-05-02

The changing status between "awaiting reviewer selection" and "awaiting reviewer assignment".

HemeH 2022-05-02

The editor had been idle for 21 days before finally starting to await reviewer assignment.

HemeH 2022-04-20

May I ask if this information you provided is true and exists?

mqlong 2021-11-10

Didn't listen to the editor's words, Xiaoxiu was instantly rejected, angering the editor. Such a waste. It was modified three times, delaying it for 11 months.

mqlong 2021-11-10

Still always taking rejection as a dangerous person.

mqlong 2021-11-10

The appropriate reviewers for the articles I possibly submitted were not found, so the process was relatively slow. The editor-in-chief did make some changes to the sentences in the end, as they prefer using British English. The editor-in-chief seems to have a strong personality and always says, "If you don't follow my requirements, I will reject your submission next time." I wonder if anyone else has had a similar experience.

wlsh 2021-09-19

The review process is fast, and generally, review suggestions can be provided within a week. Major revisions are usually given a two-month revision period, while minor revisions are given one month. Grammar and formatting errors in the later stages of the paper will be returned for minor revisions. Language requirements are relatively strict, and the associate editor and editor-in-chief may make minor modifications to the language of the article.
Submitted on April 24th
Accepted on September 18th