Verified Reviews - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
lactorhu 2023-08-09
After reading the guidelines, I found that the deadline for the review draft of the minor revisions is 3 weeks, without the option of extending it by 2-3 weeks as in the first and second revisions. Therefore, the worst-case scenario should be that the results will be available in one month. All we can do now is hope that the reviewers will not procrastinate.
xx........ 2023-08-09
As long as it hasn't entered the "Under review" and "wait reviewer's scores" status, it hasn't been sent for external review. The "Under review" status is very short and may not always be visible. In fact, the "awaiting ae assigns reviewer" status means that the Associate Editor is still reviewing it and hasn't decided to send it for review yet. Once it is sent for review, if the number of reviewers accepting the review does not meet the minimum requirement, it will be under review. If it meets the minimum requirement, it will be in the "wait reviewer's scores" status.
whdong 2023-08-08
Can the status "awaiting ae assigns reviewers" also mean a desk rejection?
lactorhu 2023-08-08
Thank you for your reply. My first review took exactly two months and two days, while the second review took one and a half months. The AE (Associate Editor) was very efficient, as they recommended the first and second reviews in just one day. For the second review, my submission entered the waiting for scores status on the second day. The main delay was caused by the reviewers.
xx........ 2023-08-05
xd, how many days does it usually take for you to review?
xx........ 2023-08-05
Uncertainly, I have submitted my Accept Pending Minor Revision to the reviewer, usually within two weeks.
lactorhu 2023-08-04
Unlike most submission experiences, mine does not require "no external review." This means that I need to have the reviewer reevaluate it once more.
Any experienced individuals with similar experiences, could you provide an estimate of how long this revision process might take? Hopefully, it won't take another month, right?
whdong 2023-07-21
Submitted for 7 days, Immediate Reject, very fast speed.
MHSI_Zhang 2023-07-14
What is the result now?
ssgrl 2023-06-16
Once there was a ridiculous TMI submission experience, lasting 45 days, and it was immediately rejected. All I could do was laugh it off.
chasing 2023-06-13
I suddenly became "awaiting eic decision." It has been one and a half months, and I really can't understand the reviewing status of this submission.
能中就行 2023-06-13
6.13 reject/resubmit There are seven reviewers. Why are there so many? I can't believe it.
能中就行 2023-06-06
It should be that the status changes only when all four reviewers agree. It is possible that some have already started reviewing. If there are enough two, it is possible to skip the "under review" stage directly.
chasing 2023-06-02
It has been a month, and I am still assigned to AE assigns reviewer. What is this?
能中就行 2023-05-30
5.30 Awaiting EIC Decision. Feels like it's coming.
能中就行 2023-05-11
Record record
4.20 submission
Around 4.27 under review
4.27-- Wait for Reviewers' Scores
Jackson 2023-03-30
The text is already in English.
搬砖毕业 2023-03-28
Posted in early September, under review in October, bounced back once during the process, AE assigned reviewer on January 20th, requested for revisions on January 31st, revised in mid-February, accepted at the end of March, took nearly 7 months.
sslls 2023-03-27
After three and a half months, AE recommends. After one week, under review. Did they find a new reviewer again?
喂喂喂 2023-03-27
Brother, how long does it take for you to recommend AE? Have you accepted it? I've been in this state for a week and there hasn't been any movement.
WRen 2023-03-14
Early TMI used to have very classic articles about hardware systems, as well as classic reconstruction algorithms. However, in recent years, it has completely become a journal for Chinese people to publish DL + medical image articles. Our very innovative hardware work was delayed for 4 months by the AE and eventually rejected due to a small number of animals. We followed up with review reminders three times but to no avail. In the end, our work was snatched and published by colleagues, leaving us with no choice but to reluctantly submit to a lower impact factor journal. It is disappointing and disheartening.
Jackson 2023-03-08
I feel like AE should have been changed. It was still under review during Christmas, and then it became AE assign reviewer. But now it has changed again. This journal suddenly became too slow. It took half a year from submission to acceptance for a previous article...
shallery 2023-03-06
Excuse me, which round are you on?
Jackson 2023-02-28
2022. 9. 26 Submitted
2023. 2. 28 Wait for Reviewers' Scores
shallery 2023-02-23
Take note of it.
Submission 230108.
0223 Still waiting for reviewers' scores...
LiamZhang 2023-02-06
May I ask, how deep is the research on the registration of dl-base now? Can you tell me about it, please? Teacher.
LiamZhang 2023-02-06
It is possible that the reviews have already been re-evaluated during the distribution process.
LiamZhang 2023-02-06
Understanding the Top Journal of Medical Imaging
LiamZhang 2023-02-06
It is like this, this journal is really awesome.
MHSI_Zhang 2023-01-29
Decide to appeal, without expecting any hope!
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started