hengshao 2022-01-04

Submission: 2021-10-6
First review: 2021-11-7
Submission of review comments: 21 days
Second review acceptance: 2022-01-02

xtrnn 2022-01-04

2021.3.30 Submitted to journal
2021.4.6 Under Review
2021.4.10 Under Review
2021.4.12 Under Review
2021.4.27 Decision in Process
2021.5.25 Reject and Resubmit
2021.6.1 Revision submit
2021.6.4 Under Review
There was another revision between 6.4-8.18, but I forgot the date.
2021.8.18 Accept

fremy1993 2022-01-01

Will the first revision add reviewers for the second revision?

fremy1993 2022-01-01

Will the first revision and the second revision increase the number of reviewers?

ZHAO J C 2021-12-31

December 31: The version of the extended page agreement is incorrect, please resubmit.

ZHAO J C 2021-12-24

DEC 24 submission of manuscript

修炼的韭菜 2021-12-24

Because comments cannot exceed 500 characters, the submission process is shared here:
Oct 1, 2021, 6:28 AM - With Editor
Oct 8, 2021, 2:09 AM - Under review
Oct 8, 2021, 2:27 AM - Under review
Oct 19, 2021, 12:38 AM - Under review
Oct 26, 2021, 10:06 PM - Under review
Nov 7, 2021, 5:51 PM - Major Revision
Nov 27, 2021, 8:17 AM - Revised Manuscript Submitted
Dec 1, 2021, 10:29 AM - With Editor
Dec 6, 2021, 9:27 PM - Under review
Dec 20, 2021, 6:19 AM - Required reviewer completed.
Dec 21, 2021, 8:49 AM - Decision in process
Dec 23, 2021, 7:57 AM - Accepted

修炼的韭菜 2021-12-24

The process of submission is shared as follows. After submitting on October 1st, three reviewers quickly accepted the review on the same day, maybe because they were interested in the article's title and found it innovative and cutting-edge. According to online users, the change in status from "Under review" may indicate the acceptance or rejection of the reviewers' comments, and it seems to be the case here, as there were indeed three reviewers.

Within less than a month (29 days), the first round of reviews was received. The reviewers' comments were generally positive, but they also provided many suggestions for improvement, indicating a very professional review process. After carefully revising the manuscript, it was resubmitted, and on December 20th, the status changed to "required reviewers completed." One day later, it automatically changed to "Decision in process." It was a difficult two days waiting for the decision... However, in the end, it was accepted. All three reviewers were very satisfied with the response.

TIM is a well-established journal for instruments and measurements. The editors and reviewers are highly professional, and the processing speed is top-notch. The journal's impact factor has been on the rise in recent years. Best wishes for the journal's continued success!

Pubsuccess 2021-12-23

Indeed, "voluntary" means it is optional. I chose "no" because otherwise it would have been too expensive at $110 per page (which should be deductible as an additional page fee). If there are not many additional pages, I recommend choosing "no". Only pages exceeding the limit will cost $265 per page.

论文君 2021-12-23

May I ask, how long does it take to receive the proof and how long can it be done online after acceptance? Thank you.

sanctitude 2021-12-22

Reply to that choice of "y or n", I selected "no" at that time. This cost is not an additional page fee, it seems to be the voluntary OA (open access) fee. The additional page fee is separate and will be sent via email to the corresponding author's email. At that time, it will be paid on a payment website provided by IEEE.

Pubsuccess 2021-12-22

Download the manuscript file. Voluntary page charges. Should I choose yes or no at this time?

Mex 2021-12-21

12.2 submission is still with the editor. Hoping for it to be under review soon, otherwise it will not be possible to achieve the average turnaround time for the journal.

Pubsuccess 2021-12-20

May I ask, how long does it usually take to receive the manuscript and payment email after the journal's early access is available on their homepage?

hit林海 2021-12-19

I would like to ask everyone, how long after accepting a completed order do you receive the proof?

Mz.DAFA 2021-12-19

Colleagues, during the proofreading process, there is an Overlength alert. For the following Voluntary page alert, should we choose yes or no?

风之小翼 2021-12-15

Is this journal still slow? I think it's very fast now.

Gumt 2021-12-14

The review process is too slow, everything else is fine.

光学小硕 2021-12-14

It has been under review for a month now, and the status of "under review" is changing every day from 1 am to 2 am. I don't know what's happening.

丰 2021-12-14

The editor is very responsible, the reviewer is very professional, just the rating is too low, hoping to return to Zone 1 next year.

丰 2021-12-14

The article is very strict, even though it is now in the third zone, which is too low.

光学小硕 2021-12-13

Nov 10 2021 12:26AM Submited
Dec 3 2021 1:32 AM Under Review
Dec 7 2021 1:11 AM Under Review
Dec 9 2021 12:51AM Under Review
Dec 10 2021 1:44 AM Under Review
Dec 13 2021 2:23AM Under Review

It has been almost a month under review, and the status of "Under Review" keeps changing, and I don't know what the situation is. The journal has very strict formatting requirements, and it is said that it is not easy to pass the initial review and proceed to external review. Moreover, this journal does not support recommending reviewers, and if you mention recommended reviewers, the editor will send an email to stop it and ask for a modification of the cover letter. Currently, it is classified as a third-tier journal by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and I feel that the classification is a bit low.

论文君 2021-12-10

The minor repairs have already been submitted for review. Will it take 7 days or 10 days to complete the review? Just two questions.

sanctitude 2021-12-09

Whether or not to submit for review again for minor revisions depends on the situation. After my first round of minor revisions, I submitted it for review. However, for the second round of minor revisions, I did not submit it and the editor accepted it directly.

HFS2333 2021-12-09

What are the requirements for journal formatting? Can normal LaTeX for IEEE transactions be used?

Pubsuccess 2021-12-09

Generally, there are 2-3 reviewers. In the first round of revision, I was given 21 days to make the necessary changes based on the reviewers' comments. After the revisions, the decision to add additional reviewers (usually the same ones as before) will be based on the response. The speed is really good, but it still depends on whether the content matches the requirements of the journal.

李杰 2021-12-09

May I ask how many reviewers are there for this journal? Is there a major revision in the first round? Will there be additional reviewers after the revision? I'm hesitant about whether to submit to this journal. The speed seems fine though.

论文君 2021-12-08

Is the minor repair being submitted for review?

Pubsuccess 2021-12-08

Good luck. Actually, I feel that the simpler the article's train of thought, the better. Don't make it too complicated, just include the background, methods, simulation, and experiment, and explain them clearly. The more complex it is, the slower the reviewers will be. Also, when responding to comments, be clear in your response.

光学小硕 2021-12-08

Boss, your speed of reviewing is incredible.