wangle53 2022-04-07

2022.03.29 - Manuscript submitted
2022.04.06 - With editor
Currently waiting for the editor to find reviewers.

蒋真香 2022-04-07

Excuse me, for signing the agreement for the uploaded long page, should I write my name in pinyin or directly in Chinese characters? Thank you!

妈妈咪呀 2022-04-05

Thank you for sharing your experience. I will wait for another week and then send an email to inquire and urge progress.

xixiwhisper 2022-04-05

03/11 Manuscript Submitted
03/19 Send Back to Authors
03/21 Manuscript Submitted
03/25 With Editor
03/30 Under Review

For reference only.

妈妈咪呀 2022-04-05

2022.03.22 submitted
2022.03.29 with editor
2022.04.05 with editor
When will it be under review? The processing speed by the editor is indeed slower compared to the Trans series journals I previously submitted to.

ddt001 2022-04-01

Hello, I also have a TIM article accepted. Now the requirement is to send the final version via email. May I ask how long it took for you to receive a reply after you replied to the editor's email? It has been two days since I sent the email and I haven't received any response. I'm worried if there is any problem.

杨恩维 2022-04-01

Please resubmit at 3.30, hoping everything goes smoothly.

低烈度纵火 2022-03-31

The first submission was made in March 2021, and it was rejected and resubmitted twice. The first two times, the review took three months. After the first rejection and resubmission, an additional reviewer was added.

The third submission was made on January 19, 2022, and it was marked as a major revision. On March 23, 2022, it changed to "Decision in Process." It has been just over a week, and the status has not changed yet. It has been more than a year in total, and I am hoping for good luck.

科研者 2022-03-30

In English, the translated text would be: "There is an Overlength Page Charge Agreement in the IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Society. You're welcome."

Kev 2022-03-29

May I ask where did the seniors find the Overlength Agreement? Thank you.

科研者 2022-03-29

Already hired oyeah

科研者 2022-03-25

The third and final required reviews have been completed on the fifth day. We hope for a smooth outcome.

一般的摸鱼科学家 2022-03-23

First review took over two months, second review took over one month, and the editor was very patient and responsible.
Submitted on November 23, 2021,
Major revision on January 30, 2022,
Revised version submitted on February 15, 2022,
Accepted on March 22, 2022.

phoebe0978 2022-03-21

3.19 minor revision, the reviewer has no other issues, only a clarification of a formula needs to be modified, the speed is acceptable.

杨恩维 2022-03-21

Follow-up:
2.28 under review
3.17 required review completed
3.17 decision in process
3.79 rejected and invited to resubmit
There were two reviewers with a total of seven comments. Reviewer 1 provided friendly feedback and asked about some details not mentioned in the article, suggesting adding two control groups. Reviewer 2 used serious wording, stating that they couldn't see any innovative points and suggesting running additional datasets. The editor expressed interest in the topic of the paper, gave reassurance, and mentioned that if a major revision taking more than three weeks is done, the paper will be invited for resubmission. This was the first time writing and submitting a paper, and the pleasant surprise was that there were no major criticisms of the English writing and figures.
I went on to revise the paper.

科研者 2022-03-17

Hold on, my second review will take a relatively long time, most likely because the reviewers have different opinions. Be prepared for making secondary revisions.

phoebe0978 2022-03-17

Last year in November, I submitted my application. On January 31st, it underwent major revisions. I submitted it again on February 20th. On March 9th, it changed to "decision in process". It has been over a week and there is still no outcome.

OvvO 2022-03-15

Mar 8 2022 With Editor - Changed once
Mar 10 2022 Under Review

科研者 2022-03-11

The first review took one month to receive feedback for major revisions. After three weeks, the revised version was submitted again. Two weeks later, the feedback was returned without the addition of a reviewer. The paper was rejected and resubmitted. After two weeks, the revised version was returned, making it the third review. This time, it was marked as "under review" and went through a total of four changes. It is highly likely that a reviewer will be added. It has been 19 days since then, and I am currently waiting for feedback.

yyyyyu 2022-03-11

But I saw in the email about the first revision that the second revision will be automatically rejected ?

光学小硕 2022-03-10

If TIM's first review is a major revision, there is a high probability that new reviewers will be sought for the second review.
The first review had three reviewers, and for the second review, two additional reviewers were sought, making a total of five reviewers.
One of the reviewers in the second review provided a significant number of comments, leading to another major revision. The manuscript was then sent for a third review, and it has been four months since the initial submission.
Nov 10, 2021, 12:26 AM: Submitted
Dec 3, 2021, 1:32 AM: Under Review
Jan 14, 2022, 5:07 AM: Major Revision
Feb 7, 2022, 9:15 AM: Revision Complete
Feb 7, 2022, 12:15 AM: Under Review
Feb 28, 2022, 9:51 PM: Required Reviews Completed
Mar 5, 2022, 1:57 PM: Major Revision Required
Mar 10, 2022, 5:06 AM: Revised Manuscript Submitted

ZHAO J C 2022-03-08

The journal is an authoritative publication in the field of instrument measurement, with certain requirements for innovation and workload.

ZHAO J C 2022-03-08

I submitted the article on January 5th, but due to various reasons (personal reasons), it was delayed for a month. In reality, it was only in early February that it was formally submitted for review. It took about a month to receive the results, with three reviewers providing around twenty comments, which were very professional. The second article for IEEE TIM also received dedicated attention from the journal editor and reviewers, and both articles received the first round of review comments in about a month. I hope TIM continues to improve!

LX654321lx 2022-03-07

3.4 is under review.

ssd 2022-03-07

May I ask if the revised submission, after being requested to modify the format by the editor, will be assigned a new ID for the manuscript?

OvvO 2022-03-07

Mar 6, 2022, avec l'éditeur.

c——陈 2022-03-05

Excuse me, does this journal have high requirements for innovation?

LX654321lx 2022-03-05

3.5 is under review.

piggy_one 2022-03-05

Missing one

piggy_one 2022-03-05

2021/11/08 submitted to the journal
2021/11/13 initial check OK
2021/11/16 with editor
2021/11/21 Under Review
2021/12/28 Required Reviews Completed
2021/12/30 Major revision
2022/01/19 revision submitted
2022/01/25 under review
2022/02/18 revision submitted
2022/02/24 accept
2022/02/25 final version submitted
2022/03/05 online published

This manuscript has gone through ups and downs, continuous revisions, and finally got published in TIM. The first translation was done quickly. If there are good future works, I will continue to submit to TIM.