Verified Reviews - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

letpubSCU123 2023-02-11

2.10 Required Reviews Completed

WS小陀螺 2023-02-10

It's so frustrating. The second review last year was very fast, but now there seems to be no one reviewing my second review. They should assign a new reviewer, but the new reviewer gave me a major revision without any explanations. I'm feeling very anxious.

WS小陀螺 2023-02-10

This journal's second review is so slow.

jljljl 2023-02-10

Not back yet, now still required reviews completed.

kongzhi 2023-02-09

The reviewer's feedback on the manuscript does not update the time. The update of UR time should be when the reviewer has not accepted the invitation for a certain period of time and a reinvitation has been sent to the reviewer.

stud_cc 2023-02-09

I think that as long as there is any action, the "under review" time will be updated. For example, if multiple reviewers upload their comments, or even if the editor views the manuscript.

WS小陀螺 2023-02-09

I have also been under review for a month and a half after major revisions. I'm still anxious. Do you know if the second review will involve adding or changing reviewers?

WS小陀螺 2023-02-09

Hey buddy, do you know why the second review is so slow? It seems like mine, just like yours, takes about three weeks every time it changes to "under review". Is it possible that no one is reviewing it?

stud_chen 2023-02-08

The time for "under review" has been updated again, how miserable.

风之小翼 2023-02-08

Has anyone encountered this problem?

jingjing 2023-02-07

After the original poster sent the email, did they receive any further instructions?

zengjinghui0824 2023-02-07

I have not tried this format before, so I am not sure about it. The email was sent 20 days after receiving it.

jingjing 2023-02-07

All images and tables have been merged into a PDF. I'm not sure if it meets the requirements. I also want to ask how long it will take to receive a reply after sending the materials via email.

propura_yy 2023-02-07

2022.12.24 - First review returned. Major revisions required. Then stated: Please note that if reviewers recommend Major revisions again in the next round, the paper will be automatically rejected.
2023.1.12 - Returned for revisions.
2023.1.15 - Sent back, asked to submit a cover letter.
As of now, the second review has not been returned yet. I am very worried. If there are still major revisions required in the second review, it will be rejected. I am very anxious.

会飞的毛毛虫 2023-02-07

May I ask, how long does it take to receive a response from the designated editor after being hired? ^_^

会飞的毛毛虫 2023-02-07

May I ask, how long will it take to receive a response after sending it to the designated editor? ^_^

会飞的毛毛虫 2023-02-07

I also want to ask, how long does it take to receive a reply after sending it to the designated editor? ^_^

yuguo6293 2023-02-07

May I know approximately how long it takes to retrieve the final version in early access after receiving and sending it to the editor?

stud_chen 2023-02-06

12.25 under review, and then 1.17 under review again, it seems that it will change after the reviewer's feedback.

三尺秋水尘不染 2023-02-06

Jan 30, 2023 Under Review.

WS小陀螺 2023-02-06

Has the time for your under review changed?

stud_chen 2023-02-06

Returned for repair on December 14th, still under review until now.

WS小陀螺 2023-02-06

Submitted in August 2022, received major revisions at the end of November, returned for revisions on December 17. It is currently still under review. Does anyone experienced know if there will be a change of reviewer for the second review?

future_xu 2023-02-04

Has your decision been made yet? Mine has been 4 days already.

stud_chen 2023-02-04

I waited for more than twenty days for the first review of this status.

jljljl 2023-02-04

When will you be able to come back?

zzz 2023-02-03

2023.2.3, Manuscript Submitted
2023.2.9, With Editor
2023.2.20, Reject and Resubmit
2023.3.18, With Editor
2023.3.24, Reject (not relevant with instrumentation and measurement)

Translated:

2023.2.3, Manuscript Submitted
2023.2.9, With Editor
2023.2.20, Reject and Resubmit
2023.3.18, With Editor
2023.3.24, Reject (not relevant with instrumentation and measurement)

里先森 2023-02-03

2022-7-23: Submitted initial draft.
2022-9-3: Rejected and resubmitted, with 3 reviewers and 10 comments. Based on the reviewers' comments, it seems that major revisions are needed.
2022-9-26: Revisions requested, manuscript ID 4828. Checked on October 24th, still showing "manuscript submitted". According to the information from earlier, on September 18th, manuscript ID 4683, over 140 submissions were received within a week.
2022-11-23: Accepted.
Overall, it is good. However, there was a delay in the revisions process in October due to the high number of submissions, resulting in a longer waiting time. Nonetheless, the reviewers' comments were fair and reasonable.
Also, for IEEE TIM, there is an additional fee of $265 per page for the remaining part exceeding 8 pages. It's quite expensive.

stud_chen 2023-02-02

The time has been updated to 1.17 under the view. I got screwed over by this journal. If I submit to IEEE Sensors, I will have both papers sorted out.

future_xu 2023-02-02

How did it go for you afterwards? Mine is also in "decision in process" status for a long time.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now