jessi.. 2022-08-30

My status has also been "awaiting reviewer assignment" for two weeks now. What is your current status, OP?

JSHesthaven 2022-08-18

Posted on July 22nd;
Rejected and resubmitted on August 11th. Two reviewers provided minor and major revisions, giving a three-month deadline for revisions.

往南0909 2022-08-09

The first review took 18 days to produce results, and it has been 15 days since the second submission without being assigned to a reviewer. Is this delay due to not donating for the first time? Is this phenomenon normal?

大开大海 2022-07-03

Can I submit 2 articles at the same time?

Dawn114 2022-06-25

29-Mar-2022 Submission
3-May-2022 Reject and resubmit
7-Jun-2022 Revision
24-Jun-2022 Accept
The first submission took over ten days to reach the reviewer's hands, but the process was faster afterwards. I am very happy to have my first SCI paper accepted by LawP.

浅灰橙 2022-06-24

The first submission was reviewed a few days after submission and turned into "awaiting reviewer scores" after a month. It feels a bit slow.
The second submission is noticeably slower. It has been a week since I submitted it, and the administrator has not processed it yet. It could be due to the holiday period, as the speed is usually slower during the summer vacation.

tell_more 2022-05-23

3-Mar-2022 Submission
4-Apr-2022 Reject & Resubmit
17-May-2022 Resubmission
22-May-2022 Accept

jingda 2022-04-19

After the revision on April 19th, the acceptance was received directly. The reviewers responded quickly, and the editing process was also very smooth. It took a total of 3 months. The recognition of AP's letters in the industry is very high, ranking in the top 2nd district of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Publishing an article in it is still highly desirable, especially since its impact factor has increased again this year.

jingda 2022-04-08

The paper was submitted on March 19th and only reached the reviewer's hands on April 3rd. The editing efficiency of AWPL is so slow. I don't know how long it will take to complete the second review now.

ppqppz 2022-04-08

Translation: The second rejection and resubmission, one of the reviewers believed that the article was well written, and both the simulation and experiments were well done. However, they were not satisfied with the performance of the designed device. Could anyone who has encountered a similar issue provide some guidance?

ppqppz 2022-04-05

One of them has already yielded results, undergoing minor revisions in the first review, while waiting for the outcome of the other.

ppqppz 2022-03-29

The first review period was 22 days, very fast. The rejection and resubmission process was difficult, with extremely strict conditions. It made it impossible for the additional experimental group to provide support, so we had to reluctantly give up and turn to MOTL.

The second and third papers are currently being submitted. This time, the review period has obviously lengthened. One of the papers has been awaiting results for over a month, while the other has faced more obstacles. Finally, after over a month, it has been assigned to reviewers. Hopefully, both papers will have good outcomes.

jingda 2022-03-20

January 28th submission.
February 15th first review returned, requesting emphasis on novelty.
March 19th resubmission, results unknown.

晚报君 2022-02-19

12-Dec-2021 Submission
17-Jan-2022 Reject & Resubmit
19-Feb-2022 Accept

It was still quite fast. The initial submission was rejected, but after resubmitting, it was accepted directly. The reviewers were quite professional, and the journal's editorial process was very efficient. The main time-consuming part was waiting for the reviewers' comments. Very nice.

yao 2021-12-24

After accepting, it will be early access in 5 days, and it takes about half a month to receive the proof after acceptance.

微波与电磁场 2021-12-23

Hello, may I ask how long it takes to receive the proof after the article is accepted? How long can early access be granted? Thank you.

微波与电磁场 2021-12-23

Hello, I would like to ask how long it will take to receive the proof after the article is accepted? How long can early access be granted? Thank you.

diqi 2021-11-02

2020-10 Submission
2020-01 Major Revision
2020-03 Accepted

涡旋 2021-10-09

Submission on July 1st
Return on July 30th with feedback: Suggested resubmission after major revisions (essentially a major revision)
Return on July 15th
Rejection on July 20th
Three reviewers, two approved, but one reviewer seemed to not have even read the content and believed it lacked innovation. Ultimately, the editor rejected it due to the opinion of the third reviewer.
Overall, the journal is quite good, but it is hoped that the overall level of the reviewers can be improved!

参惑 2021-10-09

Sorry, the total submission period for my submission from initial submission to acceptance is 4 and a half months. I chose a review speed of 1 month (22 days), but the submission period cannot be changed now according to the results displayed.

参惑 2021-10-09

2021.5.10 Initial submission
6.2 Reject & Resubmit The editor-in-chief, associate editor, and two reviewers have replied to me, stating that the paper is highly innovative but has several formatting issues, and they suggest resubmission. Since I have also reviewed papers for AWPL, there is no major revision option, so this is essentially a major revision.
7.22 Resubmitted
8.13 Minor revision
9.2 Submitted minor revision
2021.9.27 Received congratulations from the editor-in-chief, paper accepted.
Innovation is crucial, pure engineering implementation will be rejected. In my paper, I combined a common unresolved problem with theoretical analysis, modeled the problem, and derived equations for solution, providing a range of parameters. I visualized the problem through equation plotting and inferred its root cause, validated it through theory and practice. Finally, I proposed a solution and conducted comparative analysis of different methods, validating the rationality of the chosen method through results. In fact, during simulation and sample testing, I did not consider these aspects as much. It was mainly during the process of writing the paper that I condensed the problem. Therefore, it is not enough to merely conduct experiments; extraction and sublimation are also necessary to uncover innovation.
The previous article had excellent sample test data, with good volume and performance, but lacked innovation and was rejected by AWPL.
The review process for AWPL generally takes around 22 days. Upon receiving the editor's reply, it is advisable to complete and submit the revisions promptly, without delay. I also reflect on this matter. Address the reviewers' comments one by one, without evasion, and be objective.

tyrock 2021-08-30

Is it necessary to include the response to the reviewer's comments in the cover letter when resubmitting after rejection? Should I inform the editor that it is a resubmission?

uestcwwzz 2021-08-12

2020.12.20 Submitted
2021.1.19 Rejected and resubmitted
2021.2.2 Resubmitted
2021.2.15 Minor revisions
2021.2.17 Submitted
2021.2.18 Accepted
The reviewer's comments were very professional, and the review process was fast, especially considering it was the end of the year. I am happy to have my first SCI paper published.

seola919 2021-08-08

Very good journal, although it was rejected, the reviewers' comments were still very helpful. There were two reviewers in total, one had high-quality opinions, while the other was more perfunctory. They emphasized novelty and believed that if the innovation was sufficient, it could be worth trying.

采薇红 2021-05-13

You actually have two chances for major repairs?

ddanp2013 2021-03-30

Rejection followed by resubmission, minor revisions, and acceptance.
Overall, it went relatively smoothly, and the reviewers' opinions were all professional.
I had previously submitted another work, but it was rejected due to a confusing article structure and unclear analysis of principles. If there is a certain level of innovation accompanied by appropriate writing skills, it is relatively easy to be accepted.

李大大 2021-03-17

Major renovation and re-investment
Minor repairs
Employment
Although there have been ups and downs, the review comments are very pertinent! The quality of the article has improved significantly.

随便起个名字可以吧 2021-01-29

2020.11.10 Submitted
2020.12.11 Rejected and resubmitted
2020.12.22 Resubmitted
2021.01.20 Minor revisions
2021.01.22 Submitted
2021.01.29 Accepted