查理DKY21-1 2023-08-04

2023.8.4 - waiting for scores from reviewers.

查理DKY21-1 2023-08-02

2023.7.15 Awaiting Administrator Assignment
2023.7.20 Unsubmitted, requesting image format modification, deletion of author's biography, resubmission after completing the changes on the same day
2023.7.21 Awaiting TE Decision
2023.7.22 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
2023.8.2 Awaiting Reviewer Selection

少林淫僧 2023-07-30

May I ask, after AWPL rejects and resubmits, will the reviewer remain the same?

少林淫僧 2023-07-30

Is the reviewer still the same after the AWPL rejection and resubmission?

少林淫僧 2023-07-30

May I ask, after the rejection and resubmission by awpl, is the reviewer still the same?

少林淫僧 2023-07-30

May I ask, after the awpl rejection and resubmission, will the reviewer remain the same?

少林淫僧 2023-07-30

May I ask, after AWPL rejects a submission and it is resubmitted, is the reviewer still the same as before?

焦急的等待 2023-07-25

7-25，提交，等待管理员处理

7-25, submission, awaiting administrator processing

King剑 2023-07-12

Excuse me, has anyone encountered the situation where after receiving a rejection and resubmitting the article, it has been 31 days and still in the status of assigning reviewers?

cck1 2023-07-05

SUBMITTED 16-May-2023
Reject (05-Jul-2023)
The review process took 50 days, which is much slower compared to other letters.
The reviewer's comments were not very professional. Based on the comments, it seems like the reviewer did not thoroughly read the content and only briefly looked at the figures and some grammar. The issues mentioned by the reviewer were already addressed in the text. It appears that the reviewer was busy nearing the end of the term and just wanted to quickly finish the review. The reviewer seems unfamiliar with the practical implementation of antenna engineering. The innovation and comparisons were mentioned multiple times in the article, but the reviewer ignored them.

hanjiang 2023-07-05

Let me talk about this journal. I have had two articles accepted this year. It took more than three months from submission to acceptance, and there were two revisions in between. First of all, the overall quality of this journal is decent. Secondly, the review process is rigorous, and the reviewers are usually experts in the relevant field. The suggestions they provide are fair, and if the revisions are done seriously, the article can generally be accepted. Additionally, the review speed is also nice, with an average reply time of one month. Lastly, this journal values innovation. I wish everyone good luck and success in their endeavors.

ningyi1931 2023-05-27

Emphasize innovation and the opinions of reviewers are crucial.

gaoxinmr 2023-05-21

Hello, how much is the layout fee for this journal?

大开大海 2023-04-30

Why did it take 14 days for my score to come out after I submitted it? Yours has already been released.

半半小生 2023-04-11

The first paper during the doctoral period was submitted on January 20th, and the first review comments were received on March 4th - minor revisions required! After two weeks of modification, it was directly accepted!

wzy2022 2023-02-07

29-Oct-2022 Submission
21-Nov-2022 Reject & Resubmit
08-Dec-2022 Revision
26-Dec-2022 Minor Revision
29-Dec-2022 Revision
07-Jan-2023 Accept
Innovation is important, and the opinion of the associate editor is also important.

Paper_111 2023-01-19

May I ask if printing fees are still being charged now?

Shan DZ 2023-01-12

Hello, I would like to ask if it is necessary to write a revision report when resubmitting after the editor of this journal has given the request for rejection and resubmission. In the past, the journals I submitted to required major revisions, so I am unsure if I should include a revision report for this rejection and resubmission format. Thank you for your assistance.

xceeet6 2022-12-25

Brother, may I ask if this journal requires payment?

jessi.. 2022-09-19

2022.6.14 Submitted
2022.7.10 Rejected and resubmitted
2022.8.9 Resubmitted
2022.9.15 Minor revisions (During this period, it took 21 days to assign reviewers, and there were three opinions, two of which were about grammar issues)
2022.9.16 Minor revisions submitted. Currently in Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The speed of minor revisions is also quite slow, and the editors have not been assigned yet.

JSHesthaven 2022-09-17

September 17th, reception.

JSHesthaven 2022-09-17

AWPL is indeed fast, arrived at EIC today.

往南0909 2022-09-16

I envy you, bro. You're really fast. Has AE not given any feedback in five days?

JSHesthaven 2022-09-15

August 24th revised;
August 26th awaiting reviewer's comments;
September 11th awaiting Associate Editor's comments;

jessi.. 2022-09-04

My reviewer finally scored on August 31st. It took exactly 3 weeks for the submission on August 9th to be scored.

浅灰橙 2022-09-04

Wait until mid-September. This year's summer vacation is just before Labor Day, when APS journal editors are on vacation. It would be better to submit the next time, avoiding this period.

往南0909 2022-09-04

Why has it become so slow recently? I remember it used to be fast. It has been 5 days since I resubmitted, and it is still awaiting administrator processing.

jessi.. 2022-08-31

It has been three weeks since my resubmission, and I still haven't received a score. I am still working on the assignment.

往南0909 2022-08-31

Received the first-instance opinions on August 24th, which is considerably slower than before. Currently, it is being revised.

浅灰橙 2022-08-30

August is mostly a slow period. I submitted my manuscript a month ago, but it is still awaiting reviewer selection. I will have to be patient and wait. September should be faster.