ComebackXin 2021-11-27

First, two reviews were published, indicating that two reviewers were likely sought. Then, two weeks later, there was a sudden update with an empty status, only displaying the time without any description. Afterward, it was updated again to show "under review."

DZLA 2021-11-25

Please refer to the submission process in posts 45 and 46.

DZLA 2021-11-25

Revision Received; Under Review 2021-11-18 11:52:29
Waiting for Revision 2021-11-18 09:31:02
Decision Made 2021-11-18 09:31:02
With Editor for Decision 2021-11-18 05:27:36
Under Review 2021-11-03 15:25:20
Contacting Potential Reviewers 2021-11-03 15:25:20
Under Review 2021-11-01 15:52:06
Contacting Potential Reviewers 2021-11-01 13:18:52

Translation:

Revision Received; Under Review 2021-11-18 11:52:29
Waiting for Revision 2021-11-18 09:31:02
Decision Made 2021-11-18 09:31:02
With Editor for Decision 2021-11-18 05:27:36
Under Review 2021-11-03 15:25:20
Contacting Potential Reviewers 2021-11-03 15:25:20
Under Review 2021-11-01 15:52:06
Contacting Potential Reviewers 2021-11-01 13:18:52

DZLA 2021-11-25

With Editor for Decision 2021-10-29 15:15:53
Waiting for Reviewer Assignment 2021-10-29 15:15:53
Initial Quality Control Complete 2021-10-29 15:15:53
Initial Quality Control Started 2021-10-29 10:13:51
Waiting for Reviewer Assignment 2021-10-29 10:13:51
Author Approved Converted Files 2021-10-29 10:13:49
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted 2021-10-29 09:15:1

Translated:
With Editor for Decision 2021-10-29 15:15:53
Waiting for Reviewer Assignment 2021-10-29 15:15:53
Initial Quality Control Complete 2021-10-29 15:15:53
Initial Quality Control Started 2021-10-29 10:13:51
Waiting for Reviewer Assignment 2021-10-29 10:13:51
Author Approved Converted Files 2021-10-29 10:13:49
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted 2021-10-29 09:15:1

DZLA 2021-11-25

Revision Received; Under Review 2021-10-29 09:15:19
Waiting for Revision 2021-10-05 13:09:45
Decision Made 2021-10-05 13:09:45
With Editor for Decision 2021-09-24 04:30:28
Under Review 2021-08-29 10:24:26
Contacting Potential Reviewers 2021-08-29 10:24:26
Under Review 2021-08-26 02:59:35
Contacting Potential Reviewers 2021-08-25 21:27:44

Translation:
Revision Received; Under Review 2021-10-29 09:15:19
Waiting for Revision 2021-10-05 13:09:45
Decision Made 2021-10-05 13:09:45
With Editor for Decision 2021-09-24 04:30:28
Under Review 2021-08-29 10:24:26
Contacting Potential Reviewers 2021-08-29 10:24:26
Under Review 2021-08-26 02:59:35
Contacting Potential Reviewers 2021-08-25 21:27:44

DZLA 2021-11-25

Waiting for Reviewer Assignment 2021-08-25 11:12:43
Initial Quality Control Complete 2021-08-25 11:12:43
Initial Quality Control Started 2021-08-24 22:53:42
Author Approved Converted Files 2021-08-24 22:53:42
Waiting for Author Approval of Converted Files 2021-08-24 12:51:22
Initial Quality Control Started 2021-08-24 03:57:37
Author Approved Converted Files 2021-08-24 03:57:35
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted 2021-08-23 11:30:17

Translated:
Waiting for Reviewer Assignment 2021-08-25 11:12:43
Initial Quality Control Complete 2021-08-25 11:12:43
Initial Quality Control Started 2021-08-24 22:53:42
Author Approved Converted Files 2021-08-24 22:53:42
Waiting for Author Approval of Converted Files 2021-08-24 12:51:22
Initial Quality Control Started 2021-08-24 03:57:37
Author Approved Converted Files 2021-08-24 03:57:35
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted 2021-08-23 11:30:17

ComebackXin 2021-11-21

Has anyone encountered a review status like mine? Initial review, empty status.
Stage Start Date
Under Review 2021-11-21 04:07:48
2021-11-17 13:50:54
Under Review 2021-11-04 17:35:06
Contacting Potential Reviewers 2021-11-04 17:35:06
Under Review 2021-11-04 11:17:46
Contacting Potential Reviewers 2021-11-04 02:43:52
Waiting for Reviewer Assignment 2021-11-03 09:14:28
Initial Quality Control Complete 2021-11-03 09:14:28
Initial Quality Control Started 2021-11-02 16:23:51

ComebackXin 2021-11-20

Can you please kindly post the progress chart for reference?

csu-lbj 2021-11-19

After receiving the first round of comments, one reviewer gave a "1" rating and a "B" rating, while the other reviewer gave a "2" rating and an "A" rating. After revising based on the first round of comments, both reviewers gave a "1" rating and an "A" rating. They also included a few minor suggestions, so it should be acceptable after the next revision. Keep up the good work.

木哈哈大王 2021-11-14

I didn't see you mention the science category/presentation categories here. I didn't even notice that this thing existed, haha...
My first round was also a major revision 2/2 B/C. The second round was a minor revision 1/1 A/C. After some further changes, it was accepted. I don't know if it will be helpful for you. It seems that the main thing is to respond well to the comments of the reviewer/editor.

csu-lbj 2021-09-08

First submission, submitted the first external review in three days, submitted the second external review on the sixth day. It has been over half a month now, and feedback should be received by the end of the month. Hopefully, there will be an opportunity for revisions.

Ludaoxiaosheng 2021-06-18

ps. Change to two 1st gears and two A gears in order to be accepted. The above was written incorrectly.

Ludaoxiaosheng 2021-06-18

First round review comments: For the Science category, there is one rank 2 and one rank 3; for the Presentation categories, there are two rank B. The editor has requested major revisions.
For those who have already submitted their manuscripts, may I ask if it is necessary to modify them to have two rank 1 in the Science category and two rank B in the Presentation categories in order to be accepted? Is that correct?

FSKLAJGKA 2021-05-24

How long will it take to receive the proof after submitting the article?

云朵奥 2021-04-25

Okay, thank you. Will it exceed 4 months?

FSKLAJGKA 2021-04-22

Is es&t better than this? What about es&tL?

翘首以盼 2021-04-22

If you switch to ES&T or Geochemistry, GCA is also acceptable. Going further, JGR may be more suitable.

翘首以盼 2021-04-22

I heard that it seems to be slow, it took some time to receive the final version online.

云朵奥 2021-04-21

Excuse me, how long does it take from acceptance to publication? That is, how long can it be searched on the Web of Science?

FSKLAJGKA 2021-04-13

Which place is better to transfer to?

FSKLAJGKA 2021-04-13

What happened? Has it been reviewed?

翘首以盼 2021-04-06

Fast is extremely fast, difficult is super difficult, it has gone through three rounds of review, each round with new reviewers, and the revision suggestions are dozens of pages long. The journal has very high requirements, mainly in terms of novelty and logical reasoning. As long as you make changes, there is still a chance. Good luck!

发文天地 2021-03-30

Little Nature really lives up to its reputation. Our research group has submitted several times but failed to pass the editing stage. This time, we feel that it is the best in terms of novelty. Hopefully, it can be submitted for review.

香香 2021-03-21

During the first review process, one reviewer delayed for 2 months and suddenly stopped reviewing. The editor then found a third reviewer, so we received the review comments after 3 months!!! One reviewer suggested minor revisions, while the other criticized the lack of innovation and recommended rejection. The editor gave us the chance to resubmit after rejection. We spent another month making revisions and resubmitted the paper. After two weeks, we received the acceptance notification. This journal, to put it in a certain way, seems a bit arrogant, but indeed many people admire it. It is considered a higher-level journal in the field of climate research compared to JC, CD, and JGR-A. Personally, I don't think it's necessary to struggle with Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) unless you have a special belief. The cost-effectiveness is really low, and there are now many good journals available.

节节高 2021-03-19

This is the third submission, and I thought it was my most innovative achievement. However, it was directly rejected by the editor. I feel like I am reaching too high! If it wasn't for the high recognition from teachers around the school, I wouldn't insist on publishing a piece just to prove myself...

Be Real 2021-03-17

One of the few NI journals in geosciences, it is currently extremely popular, considered top-notch even among the top. This may be because Chinese researchers no longer pursue journal rankings and impact factors, and instead use NI as an evaluation criterion. Although GRL is a top journal in geophysics, it is also a comprehensive journal with articles from various disciplines, resulting in intense competition. I heard that most submissions are rejected within three days. I have transferred my manuscript, which was originally submitted to Nature's sub-journal, for external review to this journal, hoping for good luck...

Jiangong 2021-03-17

Recognized top geology journals, basically substitutes for Nature, Science, and their sub-journals. These major articles are generally short but precise. If you go further down, you will reach Geology and GRL. I have submitted three times but none have been reviewed, so the difficulty can be imagined. GRL's positioning should be slightly higher than the top geology journal, GCA, and about the same as EPSL. It is my dream to be able to have one article accepted!