Verified Reviews - Food Analytical Methods
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

gugu boy 2021-11-15

The overall speed of the review process is acceptable. The minor revisions were directly accepted, but the processing time is a bit long. The review status often remains unchanged for a long time. Take it slowly and keep going!

fandy 2021-05-27

Hello, my current status is also "reviews completed". I estimate that I will be rejected next, sigh.

先生的科学 2021-04-26

2018.11.1, submit
2019.1.11, major repair
2019.2.20, R1
2019.4.8, receive

czdrs2006 2021-03-05

The review efficiency is too low, suggesting caution when submitting!

Submitted on January 12th, the status remained as "editor assignment pending" for a whole month. When I wrote an inquiry email, the response was relatively quick, stating that the editor was busy. One week later, it changed to "editor invited."

On February 16th, it became "reviews completed."

On March 5th, it was rejected with the reason being unsuitability for this journal.

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started