Verified Reviews - EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

white1503 2023-06-27

The first trial takes 40 days.

AHA0503 2023-06-27

6.27 submit translates to "June 27th submission" in English.

特邀审稿人 2023-06-27

After looking through the comments, many people are saying that the review process for this journal is very long. I have spent a total of two years reviewing dozens of articles for this journal (including revisions). I have been rejected several times during the review process because I simply didn't have the time. Personally, I think the length of the review process varies, but the most I have seen is seven reviewers providing feedback. I have never submitted as the first author to this journal before, but seeing everyone's excitement, I couldn't resist giving it a try. Let's witness it together.

6.22: Submitted
6.23: Highlighted for revision
6.24: Received by the editor
6.25: Received by the associate editor

qiujiangwang 2023-06-27

How many reviewers does this journal usually have?

小小新新仔 2023-06-27

It has been 6 weeks with the editor.

lingerxin 2023-06-26

I have also been dipping for almost a month.

龙弟 2023-06-26

Brother, what LaTeX template are you using? Could you send it to me? Thank you very much.

堂庭之山 2023-06-25

How are you? I've been using Dip for almost a month too. Do you have any results? Kick me if you do! ?

废柴研究生 2023-06-25

The chief editor is Professor Binshan Lin.

北纬30度 2023-06-25

I have received all 6 sets of review comments, why is the status still "under review"... There is not even an RRC.

特邀审稿人 2023-06-25

This is a comprehensive journal. The number of submissions for each research direction varies. If we publish based on a first-come-first-served basis, it may result in a large number of articles from a particular research direction in each issue. Therefore, we can only delay the publication of some articles and arrange them in other issues. If there are a lot of submissions in your research direction, they will be published later, and if there are fewer submissions, they will be published faster. Understand? Of course, it does not rule out a few cases where privileged individuals cut in line.

看头像一起讨论 2023-06-25

Can I ask who is the editor-in-chief? Thank you, thank you.

看头像一起讨论 2023-06-25

This is the fastest I've ever seen.

resl_te 2023-06-24

In the building, it is said that the editor-in-chief is controlling the submission of manuscripts and managing time. How should this be understood?

resl_te 2023-06-24

It's been almost two months since the DIP, I'm very worried...

科研汤 2023-06-22

2023.6.22 Updated, Under Review.

sw.fu 2023-06-22

February 2nd, submission
February 7th, first review
March 6th, first revision, five reviewers, 60 comments
April 4th, first revised submission
April 12th, second review
April 20th, decision made
May 20th, second revision, dip for one month, three reviewers, over ten comments
May 27th, second revised submission
May 30th, third review
June 19th, review completed, one reviewer did not agree, two reviewers returned comments on May 31st
June 22nd, accepted

oraclec 2023-06-20

Based on my understanding of the situation, apart from the final round of minor revisions, the extended DIP time after rework is mainly due to the reviewer(s) having some opinions or suggestions, and the editor-in-chief should be controlling the time while pushing for the manuscript submission.

nicks942 2023-06-20

It's useless to rush, it's a mess. Many people are dipping... Some have been doing it for tens of days, even hundreds of days.

2023-06-20

Ah, it's been 38 days since the first review, but there's been no progress at all. Is it necessary to remind them? It's even slower than the manuscript review... This editor is really irresponsible.

ethan-wang 2023-06-19

2023.2.21 Submission
2023.2.23 Editing for revision and highlighting
2023.2.23 Submission of revised version
2023.2.25 Editing and processing
2023.3.18 First external review completed, revision required
2023.3.30 Submission of 1st revision
2023.5.13 Second external review completed, revision required
2023.5.25 Submission of 2nd revision
2023.6.4 Third external review completed
2023.6.7 Chief editor acceptance

sobber 2023-06-19

The editor-in-chief probably hasn't had time to check emails recently.

kkfc 2023-06-19

I also have a second review for 20 days.

向日葵班插班生 2023-06-19

I've been waiting for my second appeal for 29 days.

lingerxin 2023-06-19

It has been 20 days since my second review.

sobber 2023-06-19

The first review took one month, with two reviewers raising some expression-related issues.
The second review has been going on for a month, and it has been eight days since the dip.

小小新新仔 2023-06-19

I asked customer service, and they said that the EIC is busy and probably doesn't have time to check emails.

郭大胆 2023-06-18

It has been 72 days since the third review.

科研汤 2023-06-17

2023.6.16 Update - under review

一只不懂学术的咸鱼 2023-06-15

Has the result of the dip come out? It has been two months since mine is in "required reviews completed".

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started