Verified Reviews - EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

accept 2021-08-05

Reply to the editor in section 1, reply to the deputy editor in section 2.

accept 2021-08-05

Hello, I would like to ask, how long did it take for you to receive the acceptance email after the "decision in process" status in the third review?

junupliu 2021-08-05

Hello, may I ask if there are many second opinions? Is it a minor revision or a modification of the format? My first review editor gave me a major revision. It is still in the external review status. Does this journal usually go through three rounds of external review?

好好学习2020 2021-08-05

2020-11-3 Submission
2021-8-4 Acceptance
The first review was very fast, and the comments provided were all very good.
The second and third reviews were very friendly, but the speed was a bit slow, probably because there was a change in the editor midway.

liying1118 2021-08-04

Hello OP, may I ask how you handle this? Do you separate the opinions of the Editor-in-Chief and the Associate Editor into different sections when replying?
Section #1: a) and b)
a. The complete editorial decision letter (i.e., the entire text covered in this email letter) from the Editor-in-Chief, and
b. your responses to the Editor-in-Chief.
Section #2: a) and b)

Ye20 2021-08-04

It is necessary to write another Word document, which includes responses to each review comment.

liying1118 2021-08-04

Hello, can I have a contact method? I also have similar suggestions for the review, can we discuss how to respond?

junupliu 2021-08-03

To be on the safe side, I directly copied and pasted the entire email content.

爱吃柚子的AI 2021-08-03

The reviewer's comments have come back, and it requires major revisions. May I ask if this sentence means that when responding, we should include the entire content of the email, which includes:
a. The complete text of the editorial decision letter from the Editor-in-Chief, and
b. Your responses to the Editor-in-Chief.

zhanhaolin 2021-08-02

My 22nd is still here.

多运动多喝水 2021-08-02

6.17 Submission
7.12 Under review
7.18 Required reviews completed

It has been 15 days since it reached the "required reviews completed" stage, and it only took 7 days to go from "under review" to "required reviews completed". Is it a bit risky?

努力发SCI的东 2021-08-01

7.11 2021 submitted
7.12 2021 with editor
7.24 2021 with editor
Sent me an email saying it has been assigned to the associate editor
Still with editor
Guys, are they looking for reviewers or haven't they had a chance to review it yet?

accept 2021-07-31

I would like to ask everyone, how long does it take for the result to come out after the third review with the status "decision in process"?

Drlau 2021-07-26

Submitted two months ago, it was snapped. Three reviewers, judging from the comments, I was considered fast this time. Write well and aim for a high level of innovation. The comparative experiments and analysis of algorithms should also be as sufficient as possible. Otherwise, you will end up like me, being snapped.

Fighting_z 2021-07-24

I am also with editor for 20 days before submitting for review, patiently waiting.

小屁孩 2021-07-23

This is a normal situation, which indicates that there is feedback from reviewers' comments.
Next is to wait for the AE's handling, until there are enough review comments or they all come back, then it will enter the "Decision in Process" stage after the AE's handling.
The outcome will come later, whether it is reject, revise, or accept.

junupliu 2021-07-22

The decision stage will be reached soon. Don't panic.

爱吃柚子的AI 2021-07-22

Are you stuck at the Required Reviews Completed stage of the manuscript review process? Does that mean it is going to be rejected?

zhanhaolin 2021-07-22

I would like to ask how long does it usually take for a "with editor" status? It has been almost 20 days since I received the "with editor" status for my article. If there is no immediate rejection, does it mean that my article fits the journal's scope? My article belongs to an interdisciplinary field, and when I submitted to another journal in a different discipline recently, it was immediately rejected for not fitting the journal's scope. With the "with editor" status taking this long, does it mean that the risk of not fitting the scope is relatively low, or is it possible that the editor has not started reviewing it yet...

NookLook 2021-07-19

"June 10 under review" translates to "June 10 is being reviewed" in English.

Fighting_z 2021-07-09

Do I need to recommend reviewers when submitting to this journal? I chose "not recommended" when submitting, and I'm a bit worried.

Fighting_z 2021-07-09

What does "更新" mean? Isn't it "under review"?

Drlau 2021-07-08

After the first under review, I have already updated it three times. There are so many reviewers, feeling a little anxious...

奕小子阳 2021-07-08

My application showed "under review" on June 21st, and then was updated on July 1st and July 6th. The fast speed made me feel anxious. Is this speed normal?

chong 2021-07-07

The first trial took one month (with an external review of 15 days), and the chief editor's handling speed was very nice.

心想事成 2021-07-07

During the period from submission to acceptance, two major revisions were made, taking nearly a year.

奕小子阳 2021-07-06

The text is already in Simplified Chinese. Here is the translation into English:

"I submitted it at the end of May, and on June 21st, it showed 'under review.' It is still in the 'under review' status now. It was updated on July 1st. I feel anxious, why is it processed so quickly?"

ddtenvelope 2021-07-03

There is also a "decision in process" stage for the first trial, and my first trial took 2 months.

accept 2021-07-02

Received journal revision comments on June 10th (suggested by reviewers), returned revised manuscript on June 27th; received identical revision comments on July 2nd (suggested by the editor) as the ones received on June 10th. Have any of you encountered this situation, my friends?

erhgu8 2021-07-01

Generally, this journal has two reviewers, but if one of them is acceptable and the other's opinion is not good, then it depends on whether the associate editor wants to proceed or not. Anyway, the processing speed of this journal is really too slow.

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now