Kyro 2021-05-25

There was no display of editing, but Xiaoxiu has been given today, lasting for two months.

刘海权 2021-05-14

With the editor for forty days, sent a message to urge the editorial department of Asheville. One week later, external review, external review lasted for a month and the status changed to "Required Reviews Completed". It has been five days now and I am anxiously waiting.

刘海权 2021-05-14

May I ask, how long does it usually take for this journal to reply after the completion of required reviews? It has been five days since this status was given. The first review was completed within a month, so it's likely that it's not looking good.

NPU 2021-05-11

Do you know who your editor is?

NPU 2021-05-11

Do you know who your editor is?

吹牛也要按照基本法 2021-05-11

I also became "Required Reviews Completed" on March 30th, and there has been no news until now.

NPU 2021-05-04

My paper was submitted on February 29th, 2020. The required reviews have been completed and it has been over a month. The first review has been ongoing for 14 months and I have not received any feedback yet.

wuguangbin1230 2021-05-02

Hello, may I ask how long your article has been with the editor? Is the next step "review"?

假老练 2021-04-26

May I ask which aspect of articles are you proficient in?

北月 2021-04-24

2021.2.2 Submission
2021.3.5 Major revision
2021.3.27 Resubmission
2021.4.15 Minor revision
2021.4.23 Acceptance

The review process is very fast, and the experts are specialists in the relevant field with very high expertise. The suggestions they provide are meaningful, and they have high expectations for the details of the paper. It is an excellent journal.

NookLook 2021-04-16

Application of Big Data in the Internet of Vehicles

NookLook 2021-04-16

4/16 returned for major repairs, 7 review comments...

NPU 2021-04-12

The first trial has been pending for nearly 14 months without any feedback. The current status is RRC, and it has been ongoing for two weeks. It's really incredibly slow.

一定要中呀 2021-04-07

2020.11.30 Submission
2021.1.3 Major revision
2021.3.1 Resubmission after major revision
2021.3.26 Acceptance
To be honest, it took less than two months in the editor's hands, and the processing speed was faster than IEEE. I recommend this journal and hope to enter Zone 1 as soon as possible.

xiaowei123456 2021-04-07

6 months, this mainly depends on the reviewers.

doudou820 2021-04-07

How long does it take for you to review it for the first time?

doudou820 2021-04-07

It has been two months since my under review status. I wonder if I can request an update? I am anxiously waiting.

doudou820 2021-04-07

Can I request a reminder for the manuscript? It has been two months since the first review.

kydog 2021-04-03

2020.10 Submission
2021.2 Major revision
2021.3.23 Return
........................................

湾区小霸王 2021-04-02

This magazine is very good, with a low self-citation rate. The editor-in-chief is very responsible, and the reviewers' opinions are also very fair.
PS: Complaining about the Chinese Academy of Sciences' journal ranking system is just too outdated. This magazine is definitely a great gem, and I hope it will soon be classified as a first-tier journal.

recall 2021-03-31

Reply to the above: Until today, it is still being processed in the "with editor" state and has not been submitted for review.

52zty 2021-03-27

Has your manuscript been reviewed? I submitted mine on March 6th and it still hasn't been reviewed.

recall 2021-03-22

Is the host really that fast? Can you specify which field?

recall 2021-03-22

After March 2nd, it has been with the editor continuously, which is frustrating. The deviation from the average review time of the journal is too significant.

NookLook 2021-03-18

submit Feb 21, 2021
with editor Feb 23, 2021
review Mar 3, 2021
required review completed Mar 17, 2021
Such a fast speed, it's gone...

vx-FXS_97 2021-03-11

Could you please briefly explain the specific direction of your investment in water resources?

我是一个小骗子 2021-02-25

9/14 submitted, still editing after over a month.
10/23 sent to reviewer after sending a letter to urge submission.
12/03 returned for major revisions.
1/03 revised.
2/24 accepted.

一个小渣渣 2021-02-19

Great journal, Elsevier's editors and responsible persons are commendable. The first review was a bit slow, had to remind them once, but the second review was quick. After the Lunar New Year, I received an acceptance email. Personally, I feel that EAAI can be considered as a convincing journal in the field of science and engineering.

Rough process:
Submitted in late October 2019.
Reminder sent in early April 2020.
Received first review comments at the end of July 2020, revised in mid-August.
Received second review comments at the end of November 2020, revised in mid-December.
Accepted in mid-February 2021.

I hope this is helpful to everyone, and if you have enough time, I highly recommend giving it a try.

zuomeng844 2021-02-02

It has been a month since I submitted, but it hasn't been reviewed yet. Does anyone know what's going on? I have also emailed the editor-in-chief, but it was of no use. They have been keeping me hanging without any response or review.

二一老人 2021-01-28

Before when I asked for the manuscript, it had already been more than 20 days, and it still hadn't been assigned a number. Please phrase it more tactfully when you speak. Currently, it is still with the editor, and I have already reminded them once. I'm sorry for bothering them again.