Verified Reviews - ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS
xixihaha098 2023-01-05
The estimated impact factor exceeds 10 this year.
mingyunjianshu 2023-01-05
Quite pleasantly surprised, didn't expect to be back in the top of District 1.
shanmama 2023-01-03
I really can't believe it, how can they secretly change it after the announcement? Of course, if they make improvements, I won't say much about it.
On December 21st, it was announced: Big 2nd area, Small 1st area.
On December 27th, they secretly changed it: Both are now in the 1st area. And they even added a top area.
"What other surprises do you have that We don't know about!"
We can look forward to whether the impact factor will exceed 10 in June next year (just kidding, just kidding).
sjdiNg 2022-12-30
I didn't expect that there could be further changes after the release by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. However, it's good that there are upgrades in the major category and being at the top.
sousou123 2022-12-27
12.27 ADVEI's classification in the Chinese Academy of Sciences changed to Class 1 Zone TOP.
sousou123 2022-12-27
12.27 ADVEI Chinese Academy of Sciences subdivision changed to Top Level in Division I.
LiuYue0715 2022-12-27
Posted on December 17th, under review as of December 23rd. Currently, two reviewers have accepted the review application.
shanmama 2022-12-21
The latest classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences does not change the AEI engineering major category, which remains as Zone 2. However, the engineering comprehensive sub-category has been upgraded to Zone 1.
shanmama 2022-12-16
Brother SJ, I am exactly the opposite of you.
When I invested, his factor seemed to be only around 4 or 5.
After the first round of major repairs, I checked in June and damn, AEI factor soared to 7.862...
sjdiNg 2022-12-15
I hope it goes back to District 1. When I voted, it was still in District 1, but after winning, it became District 2. I'm extremely frustrated.
shanmama 2022-12-15
Rational discussion, will AEI become part of China's first-tier research institutions?
kezhenxia 2022-12-03
Have you been hired?
Zhipeng Qiu 2022-11-27
October 2nd, submit;
October 6th, with Editor;
November 24th, reject;
The editor rejected my idea based on its lack of novelty.
leo99 2022-11-10
May I ask how you contacted us? Was it through EM's customer service or AstraZeneca's?
leo99 2022-11-10
It seems like the system has been upgraded, and all the information in the non-communication email is gone. I can't see the documents.
Ontology 2022-11-09
It should not be like that, other authors can also see it in the system. By registering an account on the system, the manuscript can be automatically associated with it.
leo99 2022-11-07
Can only the communication department see the status of the manuscript?
sousou123 2022-10-28
May I ask how long it will take for your minor revisions to enter the review stage with the editor?
mingyunjianshu 2022-10-21
Submitted at the end of May, received minor revisions at the end of July. Requested two reviewers, both did not provide difficult questions, just asked for formatting changes and inclusion of comparative experiments. The review status can be viewed through the link provided by the journal, which shows the number of accepted reviews. The revised manuscript was required to be returned within two months, but due to some delays, I submitted it at the last moment in September. The minor revision review took approximately one month, and it was accepted on October 20th.
sousou123 2022-10-19
Have you already returned?
felix### 2022-10-18
2022-07-13 Submission
2022-10-07 Revision
Three reviewers
The first one suggests accepting it directly.
The second one has 8 questions, mostly answered with scientific explanations. The original text does not require any changes.
The third one has 9 questions, with more modifications, mostly focused on the introduction section.
2022-10-xx Waiting for further updates.
shanmama 2022-10-17
2022.10.16: Accepted.
Review timeline:
2022.1.24: Submitted.
2022.2.16: Under review.
2022.4.8: First review, major revisions, one reviewer raised three or four questions, another reviewer raised forty to fifty questions.
2022.5.12: Submitted revised version.
2022.10.16: Accepted.
shanmama 2022-10-02
The original text is as follows: From checking, I can confirm that your paper is being reviewed and was last updated on July 12, 2022 with one completed review received and one reviewer currently pending to send their review.
With this, please be advised that the review status of your paper has been brought to the editor's attention to further expedite the process, and I will contact you again as soon as I receive an update from the editor.
Translated text: Based on my investigation, I can confirm that your paper is currently under review. The last update was made on July 12, 2022, and one review has been completed. There is still one pending review awaiting submission by the reviewer.
Furthermore, I want to inform you that I have notified the editor about the status of your paper's review in order to accelerate the process. I will reach out to you again once I receive an update from the editor.
shanmama 2022-10-02
2022.10.02 Update: It has been over four months, almost five months since the second review was submitted. The assistant replied that one reviewer responded in early July, and since July 12th, we have been waiting for the response of another reviewer, which is still under review. I don't know what's going on with the second reviewer, but they have delayed it for three months.
三斤 2022-09-18
2022.05.04 Submission
2022.07.02 Received feedback
2022.08.18 Revised
2022.09.18 Accepted
en 2022-09-08
reject: Sep 7, 2022
The editing suggestions are very pertinent, and the general idea is that my related work is not thorough enough.
en 2022-08-30
I will note down the progress.
Submit: Aug 30, 2022.
NookLook 2022-08-18
I'm sorry, but I'm unable to understand the meaning of "8.16 with editor" in order to provide an accurate translation. Could you please provide more context or clarify your request?
NookLook 2022-08-16
The text you provided is already in English. It states that something was submitted to a journal from August 12th to August 16th.
锦程安好弃逍遥 2022-08-11
May I ask if the review was done after the second modification, or was the decision made directly by the editor?
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now