阿飞 2021-08-21

Yes, don't worry, the second review is under review and will be accepted directly.

飞飞0217 2021-08-20

Anxious! Any news to share? Hhh.

corsci 2021-08-20

July 19th major revision
July 23rd under review
August 6th minor revision
August 9th accept

阳春白雪 2021-08-20

Mine has also been 10 days, and like you, it is still under review.

飞飞0217 2021-08-19

I haven't received mine yet. It has been under review for about 10 days. How about yours?

阳春白雪 2021-08-19

Hello, has your paper been accepted now? Mine is still under review after revision.

哈哈嘿嘿 2021-08-18

Which direction are you going? and who will receive it?

飞飞0217 2021-08-18

My visit is under review for 1-2 weeks.

啊啊啊阳光中年 2021-08-18

How long does it take to go from "with editor" to "under review"?

caso 2021-08-17

The final result was unexpectedly six reviewers, with four revisions and two rejections. The editor rejected it and also prohibited further submissions.

CCRCCCCBM 2021-08-17

It has been over a month with the editor. I am frustrated. It's the first time I have encountered something so slow.

飞飞0217 2021-08-17

My current return for repair is about three weeks, still under review!

阳春白雪 2021-08-16

Hello, it has been half a month since my return for repair, and there is still no result. It is still under review status. Did yours directly change to accept after being under review?

阳春白雪 2021-08-16

Hello, how have you been lately? When were you hired? I have already submitted my repair request, but it has been half a month now and there is still no result.

xxxt 2021-08-12

May I ask if the reviewers will receive an email when accepting the review?

Edward_XIN 2021-08-11

My previous articles were also rejected by Hong Kong's Poon, although the feedback was still acceptable.

kingwangmc 2021-08-10

Hello, may I ask who the managing editor is?

泰泰 2021-08-09

8 August under review

kingwangmc 2021-08-07

I wonder if all my future papers will be edited by Chi-sun Poon?

哈哈嘿嘿 2021-08-06

Recently, CBM seems to be less friendly towards domestic articles. The opinions given by my four reviewers were relatively normal, but the paper was still rejected by the editor with the following statement: "Although they have encouraged improvement of the paper, we feel that this submission falls short of the demanding standards required by the publisher and therefore I must reject it."

天空之城-- 2021-08-06

Appealing is feasible, but it is a bit time-consuming. It is better to make improvements and submit to another journal.

kingwangmc 2021-08-06

Both papers are about recycled concrete and were handled by Chi-sun Poon as the editor. The first paper was rejected with editor after two weeks, stating that the paper was only an experimental study and did not meet the requirements. It was not allowed to be revised and resubmitted. The second paper was rejected with editor after one month today, stating that the similarity rate was 19%, which is too high, and it was also not allowed to be revised and resubmitted. May I ask if it is possible to appeal the rejection of the second paper?

milulu 2021-08-05

I'm sorry to bother you. May I ask you about the formatting requirements for Construction and Building Materials, please? QAQ

milulu 2021-08-05

Excuse me for interrupting. May I ask what are the formatting requirements for Construction and Building Materials?

泰泰 2021-08-04

Durability direction of concrete
Submitted to the journal on July 24, 2021
With editor on July 26, 2021
The manuscript number is close to 6500 and has not been reviewed so far.
Good luck.

txzlzq 2021-07-31

5-29 Submission
7-12 Revision
7-29 Acceptance
Indeed, very fast.

Oliver 2021-07-19

All reviewers agreed to accept it, except for one issue with the formula. Why can it take more than a week to return with the editor?

贪吃大奶鸭 2021-07-17

The editor completely disregards the reviewer's suggestions, I give up.

jjjjjjjjjjjj 2021-07-12

It seems like it has been rejected for over 40 days, without being reviewed. They said it is a duplicate submission of a previous article I submitted, even though the two articles are completely different.

caso 2021-07-12

Submission Process
2021.6.9 4:30AM - Submitted to Journal
2021.6.10 3:40AM - With Editor
2021.6.10 8:40PM - Under Review (2 reviewers assigned)
2021.7.11 5:11AM - Under Review (2 reviewers assigned)
Does anyone know what this situation is? Two more reviewers were assigned on July 11th.