lxy12134546 2022-07-18

After waiting for so long, today finally came the result of being rejected. They haven't sent an email yet, but they rejected it without even reviewing it. They made me wait for so long just to result in a rejection. I'm very annoyed.

南荔 2022-07-17

07.04 Posted
07.06 With editor
07.17 With editor
When will the status change? I see other classmates receiving review comments in less than a month.
07.18 Under review

lxy12134546 2022-07-15

7.1 Submission
7.2 With editor
7.15 Still with editor
There hasn't been any change in status since 7.2. Last year, I published a CES paper that went under review within four days (the editor-in-chief at the time was Wang Zhihua). This time, it's been a while and there hasn't been any progress.

wenkeli 2022-06-30

6.11 required reviews completed, and results have not been provided yet.

upcqz 2022-06-27

The speed is too slow. It started reviewing from 5.8, and we still haven't received any feedback yet. The deadline has changed four times already.

Shanshan Feng 2022-06-27

How are you doing now? I just submitted mine for review. When will we have the results?

upcqz 2022-05-30

5.8 under review
5.13 under review
Currently, there are two reviewers. How long does the initial review process usually take for this journal?

不是研究生的研究生 2022-05-16

Scum Men Journal, recommended for everyone to submit contributions.

yyzls 2022-05-12

Already submitted, not sure about the rejection rate. First time submitting.

不是研究生的研究生 2022-05-09

Surface A transferred over, and the editor has been inactive for 6 days. They promised a quick transfer, but now I'm crying.

upcqz 2022-05-08

Yesterday, after I posted the comment, the date was changed today, but it still says "with editor". Did they change editors again?

upcqz 2022-05-07

Excuse me, is there any reminder for the manuscript? It's been pending since 4.18 with the editor, and it hasn't been processed yet. What efficiency is this?

graduate 2022-05-02

I am studying gas-solid two-phase flow. It was submitted on February 24th and went under review on February 28th. The review comments came on April 26th from two reviewers, with a total of twelve comments. Both reviewers suggested revisions and also recommended acceptance. Hopefully, it will be accepted!

Taqiangrentaqiang 2022-04-28

The journal editor is very strict, and it usually takes about 3-4 weeks for the status to change with the editor. The reviewers they find are also particularly professional.

快点快点666 2022-04-26

I made a 4.2 rating, also with the editor...

Paper will be accepted 2022-04-26

I made a mistake, I haven't moved at all.

upcqz 2022-04-26

Can it still be like this? My manuscript has been in the hands of the editor for 8 days, without being sent for review or rejected. I'm very worried and thinking of changing another editor. CES is really slow.

Paper will be accepted 2022-04-26

2022, 0406, Submitted
2022, 0408, With Editor
2022, 0426, With Editor

抬头看天_低头看地 2022-04-21

August 24, 2020 submission
November 24, 2020 revised
January 4, 2021 accepted

快点快点666 2022-04-12

It has been over a week with the editor, please expedite.

Fly to sky 2022-04-12

Agreed. The two reviewers asked very professional questions. I did not conduct a comparative experiment, and at that time, I was foolishly hoping that the reviewers would not notice. However, the reviewers were so professional that they immediately found this issue. After undergoing the reviewers' strict scrutiny, I feel that the quality of the article has improved significantly.

graduate 2022-04-11

2.22 Submission
2.28 Under review
4.1—Present, one review has been completed, one is still under review, ? ? hope it gets accepted.

778866 2022-04-11

22.1.25 Submission
22.1.27 With Editor
22.2.15 Under Review
22.3.22 Required Reviews Completed Until Now

木星好运 2022-04-11

4.1 submission, 4.10 with editor...

zsml328 2022-03-28

Xiao Xiu has been back for 11 days and has been constantly with the editor. Similarly, wishing good luck. By the way, we might have the same editor.

Govind 2022-03-04

The same editor, Required Reviews Completed, accepts in about a month. I suspect this guy only checks his email once a month.

Govind 2022-03-04

December 6, 2021 - submit
December 9, 2021 - with editor
December 15, 2021 - under review
January 12, 2022 - Required Reviews Completed
January 18, 2022 - revised
January 27, 2022 - resubmit
February 3, 2022 - under review
February 6, 2022 - Required Reviews Completed
March 3, 2022 - accept

graduate 2022-03-04

I submitted it to the editor in just three or four days. My speed is unbelievably fast. I hope to get accepted. ?

justaman 2022-02-21

Submitted in June 2021, received the first round of reviewer comments in September 2021. There were two reviewers, one of whom was relatively easy to deal with (from India). Among the five comments received, three of them requested additional citations. The second reviewer provided 28 comments, covering various aspects such as content, structure, and charts. Furthermore, they gave a positive evaluation of the article. The article was significantly improved based on their suggestions. The first round of revisions was submitted on October 13th. The second round of reviewer comments was received on November 20th. The first reviewer accepted the revisions, while the second reviewer provided an additional 5 comments on the revised version. Due to personal reasons, the second round of revisions was not submitted until December 20th. It remained with the editor and was not assigned to a reviewer until January 15th. Finally, on February 11th, 2022, the article was officially accepted. I am extremely grateful for the valuable feedback provided by the second reviewer, who provided tremendous help. If they were in China, I would definitely invite them for a meal.

ttianmeng 2022-02-06

The article has finally been accepted. I advise students who plan to submit to CES in the future to be prepared for a six-month process. I consider myself lucky as I only had to deal with two reviewers, who answered my questions and requested additional experiments. I spent a lot of time on writing, but the editor repeatedly sent it back, saying it did not meet the requirements. In the end, I had to pay for a revision service (the difference before and after the revision was not significant, which made me realize how easy it is to earn money this way, ?). When I submitted the final revised version, I included a language editing certificate, and it was accepted within a week. Overall, the submission experience was not bad, the reviewers were not overly difficult, but the editor was a bit slow and strict. From the perspective of the scholarships awarded by the institution and the rewards from the research group, CES is still recognized in the field of chemical engineering. Finally, I hope the journal continues to thrive.