Verified Reviews - Chemical Engineering Journal
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

SYAU THESHY 2023-02-20

Congratulations to the host for gaining 10+.

vichine 2023-02-20

2023-01-01, submitted to journal;
2023-01-03, with editor;
2023-01-05, under review;
2023-01-21, required reviews completed;
2023-01-23, major revision; 20 days requested for revision
2023-02-09, revision submitted to journal;
2023-02-17, required reviews completed;
2023-02-20, Accept.
In approximately less than three months, my first paper received a score of 10+! I am grateful for the experiences I've had in the past.

光路 2023-02-20

2022.12.6 submit - Submitted on December 6, 2022
2023.1.16 小修(给了3周时间)- Minor revision (given 3 weeks)
2023.2.6返修 - Revision required on February 6, 2023
2023.2.12 under review - Under review on February 12, 2023
2023.2.20 under review - Under review on February 20, 2023

逆水寒 2023-02-20

Did you submit it for review?

LICHUYI 2023-02-20

The track link has been intercepted by the supervisor's gateway, and I don't know how many review comments have been retracted.

LICHUYI 2023-02-20

2023-01-17, Submitted to Journal;
2023-01-20, With Editor;
2023-01-21, Under Review;
2023-01-29, Under Review;
2023-02-19, Required Reviews Completed;
2023-02-19, Under Review.

Translation:
2023-01-17, Submitted to Journal;
2023-01-20, With Editor;
2023-01-21, Under Review;
2023-01-29, Under Review;
2023-02-19, Required Reviews Completed;
2023-02-19, Under Review.

嘴巴选手小天 2023-02-20

19 Feb 2023 With Editor

嘴巴选手小天 2023-02-18

2.18没有变动 translates to "2.18 no change" in English.

Andone Bin 2023-02-18

After submission, a track link will be received for communication.

LICHUYI 2023-02-17

Hey buddy, I want to ask, where did you see "reviews completed 1"?

LICHUYI 2023-02-17

Hey buddy, I want to ask, where did you see "reviews complete 1" at?

迷鹿南北 2023-02-17

Submitted on January 21st, since February 4th with editor. There were changes in the timeline on February 13th and 14th, but it still remains with editor. Today is February 17th and it is still with editor. I don't know what is going on.

ideal 2023-02-16

2023.01.01 submit
2023.01.02 with editor
01.02 under review
01.08 rrc
02.02 three minor revisions, editor requested major revision
02.10 resubmit
02.16 accept
It's a bit disappointing that the revised version of ENSM was rejected. I hope CEJ will get better and better. Overall, the processing speed was fast, but it slowed down during the Chinese New Year.

嘴巴选手小天 2023-02-15

13th February 2023 Submitted to Journal

ZEN2021 2023-02-14

I don't usually feel this way, but I have made significant revisions and highlighted every point in the review comments for him. I think there shouldn't be a problem if you make good revisions. Keep it up!

光路 2023-02-13

Congratulations, may I ask if it is generally unlikely for minor repairs to be rejected?

ZEN2021 2023-02-13

Thank you to Jing Tang for editing and the three reviewers. Finally, I can move on to the next article with peace of mind. I wish everyone will also get accepted soon.

ZEN2021 2023-02-13

The given text is already in English.

Judge 2023-02-13

2023.2.7 - Submitted
2023.2.11 - With editor
2023.2.13 - Under review

ZEN2021 2023-02-13

Look at the editors and reviewers, some of them share their process quickly, while others need to wait for a long time. With my current condition, you can know about my process.

ZEN2021 2023-02-13

2023-2-12 Required Reviews Completed.

迷鹿南北 2023-02-13

2.13 is still with editor.

马弗炉炸鸡 2023-02-12

The current situation has not changed, let us anticipate good luck together~

观书 2023-02-12

The review process started on February 12, 2023. We have made our best efforts to make revisions. We are very grateful for the guidance and suggestions provided by the editors and reviewers. We hope to receive their recognition and approval. Please, please!

观书 2023-02-12

Starting from February 12, 2023, the review process has begun. We have made every effort to make modifications and sincerely appreciate the guidance provided by the editors and reviewers. We hope to receive their recognition and approval. Please, we beg you!!!

果子哥 2023-02-12

How long can this status "Revision Submitted to Journal" last for CEJ?

Andone Bin 2023-02-11

2.10 minor revision - This refers to a small or minor change that needs to be made.
2.11 revision submitted - This means that a revised version has been submitted.

liguobiao 2023-02-10

Have you received any updates? Mine was submitted on Jan 27, 2023; on Jan 30, 2023, it was with the editor. As of Feb 10, it is still with the editor. I remember in the past it usually took about a week to confirm whether it would be sent for review.

aaahan 2023-02-10

2.1 Submission
2.4 With editor
2.6 With editor

科研新手要加油 2023-02-09

2022.11.20 Submission
2023.01.02 Major revision (3 reviewers, around 30 comments, editor requested revised manuscript by 1.22)
I carefully revised according to the reviewers' comments and found that 20 days were simply not enough. I applied for an extension to submit to the editorial department (special thanks for granting the extension).
2023.02.03 Revision submitted
2023.02.07 Required reviews completed
2023.02.09 Accept

It took more than 2 months, but I am very happy. Even on New Year's Eve, I was still modifying the paper, spending a whole month on revisions. I can only say that the attitude towards revisions must be serious. The editor gave me the opportunity to revise, and I must put in 120% effort for the modifications. Additionally, the reviewers' comments were very professional, and their questions were spot-on. After making the revisions and additions, the quality of the article improved significantly. Thank you to the editor and reviewers, and I wish CEJ continued success!

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started