jiamaolee 2021-04-01

Is the assistant science editor Xiao Hu?

祎祎 2021-03-31

2020.11.26 Returned for significant revision
2020.12.01 Revised
2020.12.06 under review
2021.01.15 under review
2021.01.23 under review
2021.02.07 Required Reviews Completed
2021.02.13 Decision in Process
2021.02.13 Major Revision
2021.03.12 Revised
2021.03.12 With editor
2021.03.12 Under review
2021.03.29 Required Reviews Completed
2021.03.31 Decision in Process

奔跑& 2021-03-31

Thank you General Editor Pietro Vincenzini and Associate Editor Anna Lukowiak, the efficiency of handling the manuscript is really impressive; the comments provided by the reviewers are also very pertinent and to the point; it's a great journal, I wish it continued success!!!

jiamaolee 2021-03-31

I'm afraid the rejection rate is high and the response time is slow. Do you know this editor? I wonder if they are friendly. It's really disheartening if they are slow and reject your work.

月下干饭人 2021-03-30

Xiao Hu's editing is indeed very ineffective!

Perhaps 2021-03-29

Yes, this assistant editor is incredibly slow. It is far worse than Ana's assistant editor...

jiamaolee 2021-03-29

Is this Xiao Hu editor really slow? Mine has been under review for nearly a month, and it only changed once. Looking at the comments, it's obviously slower than another editor! Sigh... waiting.

Perhaps 2021-03-29

Just asking, how many reviewers are there for your article?

mhc 2021-03-28

Yes, that should be the case where the invited reviewer declined the review, so they need to find a new reviewer.

Perhaps 2021-03-27

Is your assistant editor Xiao Hu? It's been too slow for me here, it's been over two months, and it has changed "under review" three times. I don't even know what it means.

mhc 2021-03-24

After four months of hard work, although there were repeated reviews, the overall outcome is still good.

evangaline 2021-03-15

11.30 submit
12.01 under review
12.22 The status changed three times: required reviews completed - decision in process - revise
One reviewer provided seven comments
1.19 revised
1.22 accept

卷卷不卷卷 2021-03-12

May I ask if the original poster edited it themselves?

做梦都想中论文 2021-03-06

I find it difficult to get this magazine published now. I see that you have three expert reviews and have gone through two revisions. Is this magazine's requirement very high?

做梦都想中论文 2021-03-05

Hello, how many reviewers does this magazine usually have?

mhc 2021-03-03

OP, who is your scientific editor?

pppp 2021-03-01

Nov. 28 Submit
Dec. 03 Under review
Dec. 16 Required reviews completed
Dec. 19 Revise
Jan. 14 With editor
Jan. 15 Under review
Jan. 19 Accept
Sent three questions to the reviewer, and the editor suggested using Elsevier's polishing service. After making the changes myself and having someone else review it, I submitted it again. Overall, the review process was very fast.

嘉嘉sunshine 2021-02-27

2021.02.01 submitted - Submitted on February 1, 2021
2021.02.12 收到修改意见 - Received revision comments on February 12, 2021
2021.02.18 submitted revised paper - Submitted revised paper on February 18, 2021
2021.02.20 accepted - Accepted on February 20, 2021
Thank you very much to Editor-in-Chief Pietro Vincenzini and Associate Editor Anna!

嘉嘉sunshine 2021-02-27

The text translates to:

"Submitted on February 1, 2021.
Received response with one comment on February 12, 2021. Minor revisions required.
Returned revised paper on February 18, 2021.
Accepted on February 20, 2021.
Thank you very much and grateful to Editor-in-Chief Pietro Vincenzini and Associate Editor Anna!"

mm 2021-02-24

Original: 楼主，你的编辑是哪个？
Translation: OP, which editor are you using?

mm 2021-02-24

I don't know. The crucial reviewer has also refused to review again, and now I can't see the status of my paper anymore. The assistant editor told me that it was resubmitted on the 15th, but my status has been stuck on February 3rd.

Kangjiahong515 2021-02-20

Translated text:

Received on November 16, 2020; Received in revised form on January 29, 2021; Accepted on February 15, 2021.

化合物 2021-02-18

Xiao Hu's speed is super slow, and the review process is in a loop. It feels like he is not very responsible.

拉着狗的雪橇哥 2021-02-18

The language has also been changed, and it has been sent to this editor.

三味鱼 2021-02-16

2021.1.6 Submission
2021.1.7 Under Review
2021.1.16 Required Reviews Completed
2021.1.17 Decision in Process
2021.1.18 Revise
2021.1.29 Revised Submission With Editor
2021.2.1 Under Review
2021.2.12 Required Reviews Completed
2021.2.13 Decision in Process
2021.2.14 Accept
2021.2.15 Completed Accept
The efficiency is high, and the comments provided by the reviewers are of high quality.
Made some additions to the experimental explanation in the revision.
The overall response is fast, usually receiving news within about ten days.
Great journal, wishing it continued success!

化合物 2021-02-15

Agreed, no matter what modification, even if someone wants to change a period, it needs to be re-submitted for review. I don't understand what the editor means. What is your current status now?

mm 2021-02-10

Review the routine, repeatedly submit for review.

做梦都是中SCI 2021-02-05

After a review period of three months, the review process ended on January 18, 2021. One reviewer made major revisions and added two experiments. The paper was resubmitted on February 2, 2021, and accepted on February 4. It took approximately four months in total, but finally it got accepted. I can graduate now!

sulcast 2021-02-04

Oct 29, 2020 submit, with editor
Nov 1 under review, required reviews completed
Nov 2 with editor
Nov 7 under review
Dec 7 major revision by three reviewers
Jan 20, 2021 submitted revised paper
Feb 2 major revision
Feb 3 submitted revised paper
Feb 4 accept
Editor: Xiao Hu

祎祎 2021-02-03

There is still no result, the under review time is still changing, and it has been quiet for the past 10 days.