Verified Reviews - CARBON
一个笨小孩 2022-03-31
3.23 submitted to journal;
3.25 with editor;
3.31 with editor;
(...)
生物材料@Biomaterials 2022-03-28
Always thought that by covering their own ears and touching other people's bells, no one would be able to hear them.
张临远 2022-03-19
12.10 Submitted
12.12 With Editor
(Long Christmas)
1.1 Under Review
1.10 Required Reviews Completed
1.13 Major Revision
2.9 With Editor
2.13 Under Review
3.3 Required Reviews Completed
3.15 Accept
Thank you very much to Editor Michael S. Strano!
wangcq 2022-03-12
Submission experience:
10/14 Submitted
11/7 Received reviewer comments, 2 major revisions, 1 reviewer identified serious problems, editor rejected the submission
1/27 After carefully revising based on the suggestions of the previous three reviewers, resubmitted
2/14 Received reviewer comments, this time the editor only sought one reviewer's opinion, which was minimal
2/25 Revised again
3/10 Accepted.
Thanks to Chen Yuan, editor at the University of Sydney.
杨小刀 2022-01-05
10.7 Submission
Received review comments on 12.3, one minor revision and one rejection, editor requested major revision
Returned for modification on 12.23
Both reviewers agreed to accept on 1.4
Accepted by the editor.
INNERPEACE 2021-12-31
Thank you to Professor Toshiaki Enoki and the reviewers for recognizing our work. We would also like to express our gratitude to the editorial team for their efficient handling of the process. The initial review took about 2 months to receive a result, and the first round of revisions took around 20 days. The second round of revisions was completed within 3 days.
Timeline:
- Submission: September 15th
- Editor assigned: September 16th
- Major revision: November 19th
- Resubmission: December 9th
- Editor assigned: December 10th
- Minor revision: December 25th
- Resubmission: December 27th
- Editor assigned: December 28th
- Acceptance: December 29th
- Proofreading and online publication: December 31st
唐可可 2021-12-21
10.2 submitted
10.4 with editor (edited by Liu Chang at the Shenyang Metal Institute)
10.10 Under Review
10.26 Required Reviews Completed
11.03 Major Revision (Three reviewers, two recommended major revisions, one recommended rejection. Thanks to the editor for giving me the opportunity for major revision)
11.26 With Editor
11.27 Under Review
11.30 Required Reviews Completed
12.06 Required Reviews Completed
12.07 Major Revision (In the email, it said major revision, but actually, there was only one reviewer who raised a few minor issues, including grammar)
12.10 Under Review
12.15 Required Reviews Completed
12.16 Minor Revision (The last minor issue, asking me to modify the citation format for website references)
12.19 With Editor
12.21 Accept
一片黄叶 2021-12-21
Is this the second district?
kiwimaya 2021-12-21
The Chinese Academy of Sciences always makes jokes.
小哲000 2021-12-21
Congratulations to domestic journals for winning the first place. It is a vicious competition, with intense suppression of outstanding foreign journals. This is the academic environment in our country, haha.
别影响我打酱油 2021-12-21
Warmly celebrate the domestic top-level journal, Journal of Palaeogeography, being promoted to the first tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) classification. The annual publication volume is 7 articles.
别影响我打酱油 2021-12-21
Suggestion to change the name of the journal to "Carbon and Composites". This way, it will secure its position in the top tier. Alternatively, consider having a major domestic institution acquire it, and the Impact Factor would easily exceed 20. However, the name "Carbon" is still preferable as it sounds classy and grand.
唐可可 2021-12-20
What does the latest classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences mean? Has Carbon been classified as Zone 2? Can any good brother confirm it? No way, I finally climbed back to Zone 1 from Zone 2, and now I have to go down again?
amiedy 2021-12-19
Has it been submitted for review? I have been with the editor for 8 days.
双鱼儿 2021-12-06
12.6 submission, expecting good results.
Brain 2021-12-01
9.22 submit to journal
9.23 with editor (Yoong Ahm Kim)
9.30 under review
10.26 major revision, not sharp issues
11.15 with editor
11.16 under review
11.28 accept
Translation:
9.22 - Submitted to journal
9.23 - Under editor's review (Yoong Ahm Kim)
9.30 - Under review
10.26 - Major revision, two major revisions, not critical issues
11.15 - With editor
11.16 - Under review
11.28 - Accepted
还没想好叫啥子 2021-11-22
10.4 submit to journal
10.5 with editor
10.7 with editor
10.8 under review
10.20 required review completed
10.25 major revision (two major revisions)
11.7 with editor
11.8 under review
11.14 required review completed
11.14 accept
The editing process is very fast, this is the third carbon paper this year.
还没想好叫啥子 2021-10-25
First editor-in-chief, then deputy editor-in-chief.
李凌1997 2021-10-25
Hello, may I ask if you were the one who arranged the chief editor first, and then the chief editor arranged the other editors? And the editor's date changed twice.
李凌1997 2021-10-25
10.24 with editor, the status remains unchanged, but the Status Date has changed.
李凌1997 2021-10-24
10.19 Sub
10.20 with editor
10.24 Still with editor
The status has remained unchanged since 10.19, with the main editor being Mauricio Terrones, PhD.
唐可可 2021-10-20
Hello, may I ask what kind of carbon material are you working with and in which direction?
还没想好叫啥子 2021-08-23
7.11 submit to journal
7.11 with editor
7.12 with editor
7.12 under review
7.18 required review completed
7.20 required review completed
7.21 major revision
8.11 with editor
8.12 under review
8.14 required review completed
8.15 required review completed
8.15 accept
Translation:
7.11 - Submitted to journal
7.11 - Under the editor's review
7.12 - Under the editor's review
7.12 - Under review
7.18 - Required review completed
7.20 - Required review completed
7.21 - Major revision
8.11 - Under the editor's review
8.12 - Under review
8.14 - Required review completed
8.15 - Required review completed
8.15 - Accepted
koy12366 2021-08-19
Carbon nanotube composite material
XiaoShan2000 2021-08-14
Hello, may I ask what your thesis is about?
hcy7662 2021-08-01
5.18 submit
6.18 major revision (Three reviewers, over 40 revision suggestions)
7.16 revision submitted
7.19 minor revision
7.21 revision submitted
7.21 accept (The minor revisions were accepted within three hours)
The reviewers were very professional, thoroughly reviewing the article and suggesting numerous improvements. The quality of the article improved significantly after adding several new graphics. Best wishes for further success.
李娜嘉 2021-07-30
Same question, always in "with editor" status, how do I know which editor is assigned?
事发地点 2021-07-30
May I ask what is the current status of your article?
koy12366 2021-07-08
6.3 submit to journal
6.3 with editor
6.7 with editor
6.11 under review
6.14 under review
6.26 required review completed
6.27 minor revision
7.5 with editor
7.5 under review
7.8 accept
Completed, celebrate with confetti. (PS: Editor: Qingwen Li)
koy12366 2021-07-08
6.3 submit to journal
6.3 with editor
6.7 with editor
6.11 under review
6.14 under review
6.26 required review completed
6.27 minor revision
7.5 with editor
7.5 under review
7.8 accept
Translation:
6.3 submit to journal
6.3 with editor
6.7 with editor
6.11 under review
6.14 under review
6.26 required review completed
6.27 minor revision
7.5 with editor
7.5 under review
7.8 accept
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now