Verified Reviews - CARBON
wu 2022-11-26
I am submitting on the same day as the submission date with the editor, but after waiting for 5 days, the status still has not changed.
wu 2022-11-26
2022.11.21 subject to journal
2022.11.21 with editor
2022.11.26 still with editor, waiting for further updates.
无尽的拉格朗日 2022-11-25
Dear experts, has the review process been slow recently?
ayaa 2022-11-23
Accept
Xiaoxiao0820 2022-11-23
May I ask if it has been one month since your submission for review, or one month with the editor?
Xiaoxiao0820 2022-11-23
How long have you been with the editor? I have been with them for eight days.
Xiaoxiao0820 2022-11-23
How are you doing? Mine has been 8 days with the editor.
小哲000 2022-11-14
How long does the review process take?
ayaa 2022-11-09
The translation of "Accept" from English to Spanish is "Aceptar."
ayaa 2022-11-07
Accept
ayaa 2022-11-07
Accepted
ayaa 2022-11-03
Accept
ayaa 2022-10-24
Accept
ayaa 2022-10-21
Carbon
2022.09.30 Submitted to Journal
2022.10.01 With Editor
2022.10.04 Under Review
2022.10.06 Under Review
2022.10.09 Required Reviews Completed
2022.10.19 Required Reviews Completed
2022.10.20 Required Reviews Completed
2022.10.24 Revise Minor Revision
2022.11.02 With Editor
2022.11.03 Under Review
2022.11.07 Required Reviews Completed
2022.11.08 Required Reviews Completed
2022.11.09 Required Reviews Completed
2022.11.10 Revise Minor Revision
2022.11.21 With Editor
2022.11.22 Accept
FREE-M 2022-10-12
Major revision has been returned, currently under review.
1695 2022-10-12
Is there a response now?
double22 2022-10-07
Is there any news now?
Xiaoshuoyimei 2022-09-20
2022.06.21 Submitted
2022.07.03 under review
2022.07.15 under review
2022.07.25 under review
2022.07.29 required reviews completed
2022.08.24 under review
2022.08.25 revise
2022.09.17 resubmitted
2022.09.19 accepted
Three reviewers provided positive feedback, but the response time for their comments was extremely slow. The work could have been accepted in early August, but it was delayed until the end of September.
The editor couldn't bear it either, so they gave minor revisions and accepted the work after it was resubmitted.
This is the first SCI paper for the graduate student, and it is difficult since the Chinese Academy of Sciences will further reduce carbon emissions in the following year.
lin0lin0 2022-09-09
It has been 9 days and still no news. How come yours is so fast?
lin0lin0 2022-09-09
It has been 9 days and still no news from the editor.
pocket06 2022-09-08
I haven't received any news for over a month either.
FREE-M 2022-09-02
I have been "under review" for exactly two months and there has been no change.
double22 2022-08-31
The rhythm of the first trial is three months?
Lewis W 2022-08-25
Ask the big shots who have recently submitted, why is it taking so long with the editor?
Lewis W 2022-08-13
May I ask, is there any news now?
Dr. 朱 2022-08-06
6.21 submitted
6.22 with editor
6.23 under review
7.14 major revision (8+5)
7.25 resubmitted
7.26 with editor/under review
8.05 accept
Overall, very fast.
yin1 2022-08-02
5.10 Submitted
5.20 Under review
6.2 Required reviews completed
6.6 Required reviews completed
6.12 Required reviews completed
6.13 Major revision (21 questions, 4, 4, 8, 5)
7.10 Resubmitted
7.16 Under review
7.23 Required reviews completed
7.26 Required reviews completed
8.02 Accepted
Edited by Chen Yuan, the only research paper as a graduate student, the process was very torturous, luckily the outcome is good.
迷途书生 2022-07-31
7.29 Changed the editor.
NJUSTYMZ 2022-07-29
2022/03/27 submit/with editor - Submitted to the editor on March 27, 2022.
2022/03/29 with editor - Under the editor's review since March 29, 2022.
2022/04/04 under review - Currently being reviewed since April 4, 2022.
2022/06/11 major revision - Received major revision request on June 11, 2022.
2022/07/18 resubmitted/with editor - Resubmitted with the editor on July 18, 2022.
2022/07/23 under review - Under review again since July 23, 2022.
2022/07/25 accept - Accepted on July 25, 2022.
The review process took over two months to receive reviewer comments, which was quite torturous. The major revision was given four weeks to address eight comments from one reviewer, including four challenging issues that required additional experiments and four simpler ones. I wanted to request a two-week extension and submitted four days earlier, but it ended up being sent for review at the agreed-upon time. It was accepted two days after the review. This is my first paper during my doctoral studies, and I will continue to strive for excellence!
alexander94 2022-07-28
July 7 submission
July 8 with editor
July 27 with editor
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started