Verified Reviews - Biogeosciences
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

lzugeo 2022-11-11

egu's Biogeosciences and agu's JGR-Biogeosciences are sister journals, but I prefer egu's Biogeosciences because the formatting is very visually appealing (hahaha, yes, it's quite shallow). Europeans like to submit important works on biogeochemical cycles to this journal, and it seems that there are more articles on models, as well as a preference for lengthy discussions. I study the forest C-N cycle, and it took about 1 month from submission to open discussion. The peer review process, including major and minor revisions, took 3 months (the feedback was very detailed... the paper was basically restructured). After acceptance, it took another month to be published.

Flora 2021-12-13

The reviewer's comments were very pertinent, and it took 7 months from submission to acceptance.

花花 2021-11-16

May I ask if the journal requires uploading the track change version of the manuscript, should the modified parts be highlighted in red or should the manuscript be revised in the reviewing mode, so that others can see the changes made even if they are not accepted?

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started