bloomying 2023-06-12

The editor-in-chief at Wuhan University, Yu Da, is particularly efficient. This is the first time I have experienced such a fast submission process. The manuscript was accepted on the same day it was returned for revision at noon.

2023.2.28: Submitted to the journal
2023.3.1: Under editor review
2023.3.4: Under review
2023.4.5: Major revision (2 reviewers)
2023.4.9: Under editor review
2023.4.9: Under review
2023.4.12: Required reviews completed
2023.4.12: Minor revision
2023.4.13: Under editor review
2023.4.13: Accepted

whoiam 2023-06-07

Hello! May I ask how many reviewers there are?

whoiam 2023-06-07

Hello! May I ask how many reviewers are there?

whoiam 2023-06-07

Hello! How many reviewers are there?

whoiam 2023-06-07

Hello! May I know how many reviewers are there?

whoiam 2023-06-07

Hello! May I ask how many reviewers there are?

啊啊啊阳光中年 2023-06-06

Can you please explain the detailed steps? I'm not very familiar with the operation.

南湖小法师 2023-06-05

You can track through WeChat. The communication author also provided a WeChat link in the received email.

啊啊啊阳光中年 2023-06-05

How do you know that 11 were sent? It's not normal to be able to send that many.

啊啊啊阳光中年 2023-06-05

How did you know that 11 were sent? It's not normal to be able to send that many, right?

南湖小法师 2023-06-05

4.19 submitted
4.24 with editor
4.29 with editor
4.30 under review
6.03 under review
The editor has sent it to 11 reviewers, currently awaiting feedback from one reviewer.

linmo 2023-06-05

I still made changes according to the reviewer's suggestions, and then resubmitted it, without changing the editor, and went through the review process again!

慧海2019 2023-06-05

Three reviewers, the first one rejected (mainly because of lack of innovation), the other two provided revisions (major and minor, with a total of over 30 specific suggestions, highly targeted). The editor requested major revisions. After the revisions, the first reviewer still rejected the manuscript (citing lack of innovation). The editor provided one more opportunity for revision, which is also the final chance. It is unknown whether the first reviewer will reject it again.

SCI写作交流 2023-06-04

If the rejected manuscript is reviewed again, I suggest not to submit it again. What if it ends up in the hands of the expert who holds a negative opinion? I think even if we make a diligent revision, it will be difficult to change that expert's overall evaluation of the paper.

linmo 2023-06-04

One reviewer said there was a lack of innovation, while the other one was alright and only gave a few suggestions.

CGX 2023-06-04

4.26 submit - Submitted on April 26th.
5.08 under review - Under review since May 8th.
The advisor said they saw a comment from an expert. Friends, it seems like this might be rejected.
Still under review until now.

SCI写作交流 2023-06-03

What is the reason for the rejection? Is it a formatting issue? Or is it something else?

linmo 2023-06-02

Guys, if a submission is rejected but the editor says it can be resubmitted after revision, how did you handle it? Generally, would resubmitting it still result in rejection?

linmo 2023-06-02

I feel that the rejection rate of JBE is quite high now. Basically, one rejection and one minor revision, the editor will reject it.

灰灰 2023-06-02

Two weeks later, my submission was rejected, with the explanation that my topic was similar to someone else's. I had written a review article.

shanmama 2023-05-30

Record the submission process.
5.15: Submitted.
5.17: Under review.
The paper was submitted by my advisor, and although I am the first author, I cannot see this article in the system. I don't know if everyone else can see it.
Continuing updates.
7.8: Major revision.
7.27: Revised and resubmitted.

Previously, I submitted an article myself, but it was of low quality and was directly rejected.
23.2.9: Submitted.
2.10: With editor.
2.13: Decision in process.
2.14: Rejected.
I was just trying it out, but the processing speed was quite fast. I am satisfied and looking forward to a good result for this article in May as soon as possible!

ssssssaaa 2023-05-25

Brother, what's your current situation now?

一颗小小煤球 2023-05-24

2023.3.20 submitted to Journal
2023.3.27 with editor
2023.4.25 major revision
2023.5.8 under review by the second reviewer
2023.5.23 accepted
The overall process was very fast, with most of the time being spent on external review (waiting for the first review and then the review after revisions, which took about two weeks). After receiving the feedback, the editor quickly processed it and made a decision.

一颗咸菜 2023-05-24

They probably don't want to deal with it, so they just ignored it.

Albertli 2023-05-24

The translation of the text into English is: "Very fast speed.
2023.3.16 Submit.
2023.4.19 Major revision.
2023.4.28 Submit revision.
2023.5.15 Minor revision.
2023.5.18 Submit revision.
2023.5.24 Accept."

灰灰 2023-05-24

It has been a week for mine too, but there is still no movement.

灰灰 2023-05-22

Does this still have anything to do with it?

SCI写作交流 2023-05-20

Is it because the recent publications of the research group in this journal have influenced the processing of the new submitted article?

灰灰 2023-05-19

Isn't it said that this journal is quite fast?

zzzzzzhao 2023-05-18

Posted on March 18th, it's already May 18th and it's still "with editor". I'm truly amazed. I've sent two reminders and received prompt email responses, but the official attitude is that they haven't forgotten about me. Thank you for your patience in waiting!!!