Verified Reviews - Swarm and Evolutionary Computation
ZTZT 2023-08-03
May 30, 2023: Submitted to Journal
May 31, 2023: With Editor
Jun 13, 2023: Under Review
Jul 28, 2023: Under Review
Aug 02, 2023: Required Reviews Completed
ZTZT 2023-08-03
The current status is "Required Reviews Completed," and it changed on August 2nd. How much longer do you think it will take to reach the decision status?
会飞的鱼 2023-05-29
Excuse me, author, how many times did you revise it in total and how long did it take?
cjm 2023-05-26
Do you accept Marl's article?
是婉婉呀 2023-04-10
The first trial took 13 months and was ultimately rejected.
上天保佑 2023-04-02
Brother, in this situation, is it a direct rejection?
feng 2023-03-30
2022.11.18 Submitted to Journal
2022.11.23 With Editor
2022.11.27 Under Review
2023.2.22 Required Reviews Completed
2023.3.19 Decision in Process
2023.3.21 Reject
Three reviewers, one of whom stated they could not understand and rejected it, and the editor also rejected it.
会飞的鱼 2023-03-17
May I ask, what is the direction of the article you wrote, and why did you submit it for review so quickly?
HIT-LCL 2023-03-17
2023.03.09 submitted
2023.03.10 with editor
2023.03.16 with editor
2023.03.16 under review
Translation:
2023.03.09 submitted
2023.03.10 with editor
2023.03.16 with editor
2023.03.16 under review
会飞的鱼 2023-03-15
Record the submission experience and continuously update it later. The research topic of the article is multi-objective optimization problems in the workshop scheduling field.
2023.2.21 Submission
2023.2.25 With editor
elainzaizai 2023-02-16
I'll say something about this journal,
Nov 01, 2022 With Editor
I don't know what's going on, has this editor gone missing? I'm speechless. It's still in this state till now.
wx!! 2022-11-28
Three reviewers, accepted after major revisions.
ddddds 2022-11-13
9.18 Submission
One update under review in the middle
2 required reviews completed updates
11.12 changed to under review
Continuing to wait...
smallten 2022-11-08
2022.5.3 Submission
2022.8.5 First review revision, five reviewers, one reviewer rejected due to insufficient innovation points, the other four reviewers gave positive evaluations, editor's conclusion is major revision
2022.10.3 Second review revision, two reviewers, fewer issues, editor gave minor revision
2022.11.2 Accepted
静候佳音no1 2022-10-20
Hello, may I ask if there is any news now?
sky122 2022-09-06
2021.9.6 Submission
2021.12.17 First revision, 5 reviewers + editor
2022.2.1 Revisions
2022.4.17 Second revision in progress, 2 reviewers + editor remaining
2022.5.30 Revisions
2022.8.23 Accepted after third revision
tuo 2022-09-03
Submitted on 2022-6-30, until now (2022-09-03) it is still "With Editor", waiting!
秋酿 2022-08-25
2021.11 Submission
2022.2 First Review Returned
2022.4 Resubmission Uploaded
2022.5 Minor Revision
2022.6 Second Revision Uploaded
2022.8 Accepted
AALL_ 2022-08-18
Hello, may I ask how long did it take for you to submit the manuscript for external review with the editor at that time?
搁浅 2022-08-17
Absolutely excellent journal, predicted impact factor is expected to significantly increase. Three reviewers will start reviewing from January 2022 and acceptance will be made by August. The first review will take four months in total, followed by one and a half months for the second review. After minor revisions, acceptance will be granted within one week.
匿名用户001 2022-08-07
Some are fast, while others are slow. It takes more than two years in some cases. I think the speed of review is related to the associate editor we encounter. Some associate editors are very slow in handling, taking a month to process the manuscript once it reaches their hands, and then another month to process it after receiving the review comments. It cannot be denied that this journal has improved its quality very quickly, and its reputation in the evolutionary algorithm community is very good. I feel that CCF should consider including it.
汲 2022-06-28
2021-9-28: Submit
2022-4-1: Return for repair
2022-4-27: Submit after modifications
2022-5-24: Accepted by two reviewers, rejected by one
The improvement made is on single-objective PSO. The reason for rejection seems unreasonable, claiming that the model is not attractive enough. It feels like they just found an excuse to reject it, probably because single-objective PSO is considered outdated and the editor-in-chief didn't like it either.
生煎简史 2022-05-09
Dec 22, 2021 Submission
Jan 22, 2022 First revision (Three reviewers provided minor revisions + AE gave multiple comments, totaling four reviewers)
Feb 08, 2022 Resubmitted after revision
Mar 21, 2022 Second revision (Two acceptances, AE and one reviewer provided additional comments)
Apr 08, 2022 Resubmitted after revision
May 21, 2022 Completed - Accept
Overall, the process was very fast. The AE's comments were very strict and difficult to address, but also very professional. The article went through two rounds of review in the journal Knowledge-Based Systems, taking 14 months (10 months for the first review, with only two reviewers providing insignificant comments). It was ultimately unreasonably rejected by the editor, and I almost gave up. However, when I submitted it to SEC, it unexpectedly went smoothly. I feel very lucky.
秋酿 2022-04-27
The submission came back from the initial review after 4 months.
是婉婉呀 2022-04-19
Initial Date Submitted: March 13th
Status Date: March 17th
Current Status: with editor
Every day, the first thing I do when I arrive at the laboratory is open the website and check the status. It's really agonizing.
是婉婉呀 2022-04-19
Do you have any comments on the review?
是婉婉呀 2022-04-19
How long did it take from submission to receiving the first review comments?
秋酿 2022-04-07
The review process is quite slow. It took nearly two months for the review to be submitted. However, the review speed is satisfactory.
努力发SCI的东 2022-03-20
Has anyone submitted to this journal? Can you share the recent situation, such as the speed of review and the difficulty of submission? Thank you!!!
魔力宝贝神仙 2021-10-14
Hello, I saw your comment on the website and I am eager to ask how long did you wait for the major revision of SWEVO journal? I am a bit anxious and hope for a reply! Thank you!
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started