Verified Reviews - National Science Review
BLUEBO 2023-08-08
29/06/2023 submit
03/07/2023 under review
01/08/2023 Review comments received, one positive and one negative. Editor rejected.
I don't know if I should appeal or not.
铁锭行 2023-07-26
2022.12.14 Submission
2023.02.24 Major revision
2023.05.06 Minor revision
2023.05.12 Accepted
After being rejected by Nature and Science, the article was submitted to NSR. The research was conducted abroad, and there are no influential domestic experts in the author list. The editor was very enthusiastic and diligent, and the reviewer's comments were very fair and helpful, greatly assisting the work. I hope NSR continues to improve and succeed!
Dantalion 2023-06-08
One week after submission, it was under review, and after more than 20 days, it changed to "Awaiting Decision". It has been "Awaiting Decision" for a week now, and I am anxiously waiting. Is this when the Decision Letter is being written?
Another strange thing is that my article is at the intersection of medicine and information, but the assigned editor is not from biology or information science, but from chemistry. I'm not sure if it's because they have too many manuscripts recently.
一支榴莲 2023-06-04
After being rejected by the regular review process, I discussed with my boss and directly submitted to NSR. From submission to acceptance, the whole process took less than 4 months. The efficiency of NSR's editors is very high (it's not a prestigious group, so as long as the article quality is sufficient, there is no problem). Currently, the article quality of NSR is quite high, and the journal's scale and international influence need to be further expanded. Best wishes!
ghostoneone 2023-05-25
The reviewers are very diligent and careful, and they will raise many key questions.
BBY- 2023-05-14
2022.12.08 submit & awaiting admin processing
2023.02.05 major revision
2023.03.26 submit revision
2023.04.07 minor Revision
2023.04.16 submit revision
2023.04.19 accept
NSR's positioning is second only to Nature and Science among sub-journals, covering almost all fields! It is said that the submission rate is less than 20%, as long as the work has a certain degree of originality or innovation, it will be considered for submission. The editorial efficiency is very high, and we look forward to further expanding its influence.
R星出品 2023-04-30
The timeline for submission has been carefully reviewed. It can be said that the efficiency of NSR editors is quite high. The comments from the first review were very professional and recognized the work. Of course, there were also sharp questions in the review comments, so a lot of experiments and theories were added. NSR has a high positioning, and there are many groundbreaking and record-breaking works in it, expecting further expansion of influence. We are all highly educated researchers and should not be sour grapes. Objectively speaking, as long as the work is sufficiently in place, the editors will definitely give it serious consideration.
期刊试金石 2023-01-09
2022.6.20 submit
2022.8.22 major revision
2022.10.05 revision submit
2022.10.26 major revision
2022.11.17 revision submit
2022.12.09 accept
Submitted on June 20th, 2022
Major revision on August 22nd, 2022
Revision submitted on October 5th, 2022
Major revision on October 26th, 2022
Revision submitted on November 17th, 2022
Accepted on December 9th, 2022
Changed from AM to NSR, the journal is good, but I hope NSR will adopt double-blind review to reduce familiar reviewers and further improve the quality of articles.
铁锭行 2022-12-30
Does changing the submission status from ADM to Under review mean that it has been sent for external review? Or does it still need to go through the editor's selection process?
Lyn-Jay 2022-12-25
I don't remember the exact time, but it must have been at least three months. The early stage was a long wait.
BBY- 2022-12-20
Original text: 楼主,您投了多久才under review的~
Translated text: Original poster, how long did it take for your submission to go "under review"?
BBY- 2022-12-20
Original text: 楼主,你的文章awating admin processing了多久啊,送审了会发邮件通知吗?
Translation: Original poster, how long has your article been awaiting admin processing? Will there be an email notification when it is reviewed?
BBY- 2022-12-20
May I ask how long has your article been "awating admin processing" before it went "under review"? Will you receive an email once it is sent for review?
Wanleajoin 2022-11-18
I also submitted for a month, but the template was rejected and the process was extremely slow. I don't want to submit again in the future. Moreover, I don't feel that the quality of the articles in it is very high, but I don't know why the impact factor is increasing so fast...
Lyn-Jay 2022-11-16
2022.1.20 submit - Submitted on January 20th, 2022.
2022.7.22 major revision - Major revision requested on July 22nd, 2022.
2022.9.05 revision submit - Revised version submitted on September 5th, 2022.
2022.9.26 major revision - Major revision requested on September 26th, 2022.
2022.10.17 revision submit - Revised version submitted on October 17th, 2022.
2022.11.09 accept - Accepted on November 9th, 2022.
Very fortunate to receive it on my birthday.
The reviewer's comments were very fair, hoping the journal will continue to improve!
一念狂心 2022-10-25
The first review took 4 months and currently we have been employed. Wishing the journal to improve more and more.
学术loser 2022-09-23
Is there any news about the trial? I have been waiting too. The response has been over a month without any update, it's very slow.
一念狂心 2022-07-09
The impact factor for 2021 is 23, and it has been two and a half months since submission, but there is still no result. The speed is very slow.
tracy 2022-07-01
Very good journal. This journal has published many highly cited papers now. Very impressive.
ZJUCheny 2022-06-28
I have been in the "awaiting admin processing" status all along, and it was not reviewed later. It was rejected after one month.
ZJUCheny 2022-06-28
2022.02.14 Submission
2022.03.28 Not reviewed, rejected
The initial review took 42 days, and the speed is quite slow.
小小同学 2022-05-31
Do you know the timeline for the review process of National Science Review? It has been over 20 days since I submitted, and it is still in "with editor" status.
小小同学 2022-05-31
Do you know the timeline for the National Science Review peer review process? It has been several days since submission, and it is still in the "with editor" status.
一念狂心 2022-05-10
It has been over two weeks since I submitted it, and now it is in the "Under Review" status. I'm not sure if the editors are reviewing it or if it has been sent out for review.
我爱科研,我爱游泳 2022-04-29
Hello! I am still anxiously waiting, and it keeps showing "Awaiting Admin Processing". Will there be a notification email for review, or is it just a system status change?
KKLT 2022-04-28
Yes, it has been in this state before under review.
我爱科研,我爱游泳 2022-04-28
It has been a month since mine, and it still shows "awaiting admin processing". What's going on? Was it also in this status before you were under review?
penguin 2022-04-28
Submitting to this journal is not about the quality of your manuscript, but about whether your boss has enough influence. If your boss lacks influence, even if the quality of your article is at the level of PNAS, it is highly likely that it will not be accepted for publication in this journal.
zcc 2022-04-27
It feels like it's under review. It is said that the approval rate for NSR is now less than 20%, so it is not easy to get it approved.
KKLT 2022-04-27
The submission was under review for almost a month, and it is unsure whether it has been sent for external review.
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now