张鹏飞 2021-05-25

Write down the review time for everyone's reference: submitted on March 3rd, reviewed two days later, received feedback on April 15th. There were six reviewers, two of them accepted the paper, and four suggested revisions and encouraged resubmission. There were nearly sixty comments, which were very constructive and greatly helped improve the paper. The experts' level was quite high. A response of nineteen pages was written, and on May 7th, the paper was resubmitted. Four days later, it was sent for review again, and on the morning of May 25th, an acceptance notice was received. All were accepted. Keep up the good work, don't steal or plagiarize others' achievements, and don't mind others' comments. Good luck!!!

大头 2021-05-24

Yes, there are currently two types of recruitment in universities. On the premise of fitting the professional direction, one type looks at the quantity of articles while the other looks at the quantity of articles in specific areas. Surprisingly, the requirement for overseas experience is not as high. Even for those with overseas experience, two or three articles are not sufficient.

5555555 2021-05-23

It's not easy, universities are being a bit excessive like this.

大头 2021-05-23

After graduating with a PhD degree, I chose a provincial key institution for employment. Only after publishing 6 SCI papers was I eligible for a professional position. Therefore, I urgently submitted my unpublished manuscripts to IEEE Access, which has a short review cycle. I submitted on April 28th, and today, on May 23rd afternoon, I received a direct acceptance. During the process, I frequently visited this website and saw many students mentioning that the journal became stricter in its review process after being put on alert. Thus, I was worried that the review cycle would be prolonged and delay my graduation. Fortunately, today it was accepted directly. I looked at the review comments, which were all from professionals and contained a lot of suggestions. After making the necessary changes, I submitted it quickly and felt relieved. I'm grateful to your journal for helping me secure a professional position.

lideguo 2021-05-22

May I ask if your article received one rejection and one acceptance during the external review? Did the editor ultimately request major revisions or reject it? If it was rejected, can it be resubmitted after making modifications?

lideguo 2021-05-22

Can I ask if one rejection and one agreement, does the editor ultimately provide a major revision or a rejection?

中華小萌神 2021-05-21

It can be said that the process was quite tortuous, with a total of two revisions. Just by looking at the review comments, it is clear that the reviewers are professionals, and their suggestions are very fair. In fact, regarding some negative voices online, I personally think that it is up to individuals to decide which journal they want to submit their own articles to. For those who constantly criticize certain journals, instead of spending time on venting, wouldn't it be better to read more books? Why do they have to blame others for submitting to certain journals? Moreover, it can be easily found that prestigious universities both domestically and internationally still submit to this journal.

小灰辉 2021-05-15

4.6 submit
4.27 accept
The first submission was quite fast, and the reviewer was also responsible, with fair comments.

liurangzhu 2021-05-11

Brother, is it only a week for reviewing?

HeroLai 2021-05-11

The journal has a fast review speed, and the reviewers are serious and provide very pertinent comments. I submitted two papers, one was rejected and the other one was accepted.

大黄鸭 2021-05-11

There are many formulas and many pictures, very good inside.

科研仕子小马 2021-05-10

The speed is okay. I submitted it on April 16th and received the first round of reviews on May 3rd. There were three reviewers. One rejected it directly with just two words of feedback (which felt unfriendly). One accepted it directly, and one suggested major revisions and resubmission. I made revisions on May 8th and submitted it for review on May 10th.

helloa 2021-05-10

May I ask how long did it take for the preliminary review, brother?

helloa 2021-05-10

May I ask how long did it take for this brother to go through the first trial?

liurangzhu 2021-05-08

Brother, are there any techniques to be accepted quickly and steadily?

liurangzhu 2021-05-08

You are the fastest I have ever seen, bro. Do you have any techniques to be both fast and reliable?

无惘无垢 2021-05-08

Submitted on April 30th, accepted on May 7th, finished in one week, very fast.

lyra 2021-05-08

It is not clear, but this time it was hired.

lyra 2021-05-08

Useless. I think the editor sent a rejection template, but if you're not confident, you can polish it a bit.

chensiya 2021-05-06

Have you used the paper editing and proofreading service recommended when resubmitting?

duanduanduan 2021-04-29

Direction: NLP Direction
Review: 35 days (January 16, 2021 - February 20, 2021). Return of the first review result. Two reviewers, one agreed and one encouraged resubmission. It felt quite easy to revise, took a week to make changes, resubmitted on February 28th, assigned AE (Associate Editor) after 3 days, and directly accepted after another 14 days.

o呵呵我 2021-04-29

In order to further my education, I quickly submitted my work to Access. Originally, there was no response for a month, and it was always under external review, making me feel discouraged. However, after one month, I was directly accepted, and it felt great to have the opportunity to conduct experiments. Out of the four reviewers, three accepted the submission while one rejected it, discouraging resubmission. It was quite extreme.

How 2021-04-26

Excuse me, is the master's thesis proposal being called? Is it mainly because the teachers do not recognize this journal or have objections to other content?

Alex_ching 2021-04-23

Why? Do you know the reason? Are the requirements of this journal so high now?

毛毛虫虫子 2021-04-22

The reviewer's feedback is quite good. It shows that the teacher is competent and at a good level in the same field.

gamesgenesis 2021-04-21

3.26 Submitted
3.29 Under review
4.21 Rejected and not allowed to resubmit
Three reviewers, one accepted, two requested resubmission, but the editor directly stated no resubmission is allowed. Feeling a bit upset.

Ghost 578 2021-04-21

Isn't there only one chance to reinvest?

lyra 2021-04-21

I wanted to send a reply, how did it turn into a comment? I waited for two months for my resubmission, but the message was rejected again and I cried.

lyra 2021-04-21

Congratulations! It feels like I've changed a reviewer, which is causing trouble.

lyra 2021-04-21

I waited for two months for my reapplication and it got rejected again, making me cry and ask for another reapplication.