Environmental Science-Nano
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
Environmental Science-Nano
ENVIRON SCI-NANO
ISSN / eISSN
2051-8153 / 2051-8161
Aims and Scope
Nanomaterial applications and interactions with environmental & biological systems
Subject Area
CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
12.20
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science - General Environmental Science | Q1 | #17/233 |
Environmental Science - Materials Science (miscellaneous) | Q1 | #23/196 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | Quartile |
---|---|
CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY | Q1 |
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES | Q1 |
NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY | Q2 |
H-index
37
Country/Area of Publication
ENGLAND
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry
Annual Article Volume
279
Open Access
NO
Contact
THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Verified Reviews
Submitted on December 14, 2020.
Received reviewer comments on January 23, 2020. Major revision, minor revision, and rejection were suggested, and the editor requested a major revision.
Revised manuscript was resubmitted on February 9, 2020.
Accepted on February 10, 2020.
This is my first article in this magazine. I had previously submitted a few times without success, so I am quite happy that this time it was accepted. I am very grateful to Weiguo Song, the editor. Feel free to cite "Strategies for enhancing the perylene diimide photocatalytic degradation activity: method, effect factor, and mechanism" (DOI: 10.1039/d0en01245a).
12.06 Submitted.
12.12 Assigned editor.
12.13 Sent for review (instant review).
1.22 During the Chinese New Year period, four weeks were given for revisions. A reviewer was assigned, major revisions were made. The editor may have felt it was not enough, so another reviewer was assigned. No objections were raised.
2.9 Major revisions completed, sent for second review.
2.24 Minor revisions.
2.25 Minor revisions completed.
2.28 Accepted.
From submission to acceptance, it took three months, which is neither fast nor slow. It was relatively lucky, and the editor, Susana Loureiro, was relatively fast in processing.
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started