Environmental Science-Nano

I saw that there were not many reviews for this magazine, and coincidentally I just received one recently, so I decided to write about my experience.
Submitted on December 14, 2020.
Received reviewer comments on January 23, 2020. Major revision, minor revision, and rejection were suggested, and the editor requested a major revision.
Revised manuscript was resubmitted on February 9, 2020.
Accepted on February 10, 2020.
This is my first article in this magazine. I had previously submitted a few times without success, so I am quite happy that this time it was accepted. I am very grateful to Weiguo Song, the editor. Feel free to cite "Strategies for enhancing the perylene diimide photocatalytic degradation activity: method, effect factor, and mechanism" (DOI: 10.1039/d0en01245a).

It's relatively fast, and the content is about nano pesticides.
12.06 Submitted.
12.12 Assigned editor.
12.13 Sent for review (instant review).
1.22 During the Chinese New Year period, four weeks were given for revisions. A reviewer was assigned, major revisions were made. The editor may have felt it was not enough, so another reviewer was assigned. No objections were raised.
2.9 Major revisions completed, sent for second review.
2.24 Minor revisions.
2.25 Minor revisions completed.
2.28 Accepted.
From submission to acceptance, it took three months, which is neither fast nor slow. It was relatively lucky, and the editor, Susana Loureiro, was relatively fast in processing.