Atmospheric Research
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
Atmospheric Research
ATMOS RES
ISSN / eISSN
0169-8095
Aims and Scope
The journal publishes scientific papers (research papers, review articles, letters and notes) dealing with the part of the atmosphere where meteorological events occur. Attention is given to all processes extending from the earth surface to the tropopause, but special emphasis continues to be devoted to the physics of clouds, mesoscale meteorology and air pollution, i.e. atmospheric aerosols; microphysical processes; cloud dynamics and thermodynamics; numerical simulation, climatology, climate change and weather modification.
Subject Area
METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
9.40
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Atmospheric Science | Q1 | #14/148 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | Quartile |
---|---|
METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES | Q1 |
H-index
85
Country/Area of Publication
NETHERLANDS
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Publication Frequency
Semimonthly
Year Publication Started
1986
Annual Article Volume
479
Open Access
NO
Contact
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10010-1710
Verified Reviews
I'm really frustrated. The editor's comments were actually present in the original version, but the editor didn't mention them at first. They waited until after two rounds of major revisions to mention them and then directly rejected the paper! If the editor wanted to reject it or had any concerns, why didn't they reject it earlier? I can only describe this journal and editor as infuriating, completely wasting people's precious time! I'm not a sensitive person, it's normal for articles to be rejected, but I strongly advise everyone to be cautious about submitting to this journal - you never know when a desk reject will arrive.
Alright, brothers, I'm really angry. I'm going to leave a review on other journal platforms as well. I need to vent this frustration!
Received on August 26, 2021
After two minor revisions, the first revision was actually more like a major revision. Some experiments were added and after the revision, one of the reviewers directly agreed to accept it. The second revision was still minor, and after 3 days of modification, it was returned and accepted by the editor on the third day.
The reviewers were quite professional and asked detailed questions. The overall speed of the editorial process was fast. The requirements for innovation and language were satisfactory. It is my first paper in life, and I will continue to submit in the future if I have the opportunity.
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started