PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
PHYS CHEM CHEM PHYS
ISSN / eISSN
1463-9076 / 1463-9084
Aims and Scope
High quality research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry.
Subject Area
CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL
CiteScore
5.50
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy - General Physics and Astronomy | Q1 | #59/243 |
Physics and Astronomy - Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | Q2 | #69/189 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | Quartile |
---|---|
CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL | Q3 |
PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL | Q1 |
H-index
199
Country/Area of Publication
ENGLAND
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry
Publication Frequency
Weekly
Year Publication Started
1999
Annual Article Volume
3036
Open Access
NO
Contact
ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Verified Reviews
Resubmitted on November 4th, received second review response on November 9th, with minor revisions suggested.
Submitted the minor revisions on November 11th, and they were accepted on November 16th.
PCCP is now paying more attention to experimental results. It is advised to be cautious when submitting pure computational/simulation research to PCCP.
Even though the research type selected during submission was computational/simulation, the reviewer still focused on experimental aspects and directly recommended rejection. The reviewer's feedback included: 1. Lack of research motivation; 2. Why not compare multiple materials; 3. Lack of experimental data.
As a result, an additional section was added to emphasize the novelty of the results in response to the first review. The response letter addressed these concerns with over 1500 words. However, the second reviewer asked similar questions about materials and experiments, which was a bit frustrating. Thankfully, minor revisions were requested.
Another detailed response of over 1000 words was provided. Finally, the stubborn reviewer was convinced, and the paper was successfully accepted.
2022-06-09 with editor It took about two weeks from submission to editor review.
2022-06-17 in peer review Briefly went into peer review, then continued with editor review.
2022-06-24 in peer review Probably invited a second reviewer, and remained in peer review afterwards.
2022-07-01 reject Two reviewers, one reject and one suggested minor revisions for publication. The rejecting reviewer stated that the article was not suitable for the journal, as the work done by the authors had already been done by someone else before, and lacked new insightful perspectives.
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now