PATTERN RECOGNITION
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
PATTERN RECOGNITION
PATTERN RECOGN
ISSN / eISSN
0031-3203
Aims and Scope
For over 40 years, Pattern Recognition has provided the primary forum for the exchange of information on pattern recognition research among the many varied engineering, mathematical and applied professions which make up this unique field. Original papers cover all methods, techniques and applications of pattern recognition, artificial intelligence, image processing, 2-D and 3-D matching, expert systems and robotics. The Journal also includes reviews of significant developments in the field.
Subject Area
COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
14.40
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Computer Science - Signal Processing | Q1 | #9/131 |
Computer Science - Software | Q1 | #30/407 |
Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition | Q1 | #10/106 |
Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence | Q1 | #33/350 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | Quartile |
---|---|
COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | Q1 |
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC | Q1 |
H-index
180
Country/Area of Publication
ENGLAND
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Publication Frequency
Monthly
Year Publication Started
1968
Annual Article Volume
785
Open Access
NO
Contact
ELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
Verified Reviews
First review 2021.1.19 with comments returned. Major revisions (two months deadline for modifications). Returned on 3.18.
Second review 6.9 with comments returned. Major revisions (two months deadline for modifications). Returned on 7.12.
Third review 9.22 with comments returned. Minor revisions (one month deadline for modifications). Returned on 10.12.
Fourth review 11.18 with comments returned. Minor revisions and editorial decision (one month deadline for modifications). Returned on 11.26.
Accepted on 12.2.
In the first round, there were three reviewers named A, B, and C, all of whom were very professional. Two reviewers (A and C) requested additional experiments, while reviewer B mainly focused on the rigor of the symbol system. This was the first time seeing B's reviewing method of making annotations on the PDF, with a total of over twenty comments.
In the second round, reviewers B and C continued to focus on the rigor of the symbol system, as well as requesting detailed explanations of certain viewpoints in the main text. Reviewer B provided over twenty comments, while reviewer C suggested extending the proposed method to other tasks.
In the third round, reviewer B continued to focus on the rigor of the symbol system, as well as requesting detailed explanations of certain results in the experimental section.
In the fourth round, reviewer B made minor corrections for typos. The editor-in-chief requested reducing the references to conferences and arXiv and increasing the references to journal articles.
Overall, the quality of the article improved significantly. Encountering reviewers like B is indeed rare, and although it was challenging, it truly pushed for excellence in the quality of the article.
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started