Acta Biomaterialia

translate the following text into English: Nov 22 Submitted to Journal
Nov 22 Awaiting Editor Decision or Reviewer Confirmation
Nov 23 Under Review
Nov 24 Under Review
Nov 29 Under Review
Dec 06 Under Review
Dec 07 Required Reviews Completed
Dec 09 Required Reviews Completed
Dec 20 Required Reviews Completed
Dec 21 Major Revise
Jan 28 With Editor
Feb 01 Awaiting Editor Decision or Reviewer Confirmation
Feb 03 Under Review
Feb 06 Required Reviews Completed
Feb 16 Required Reviews Completed
Feb 22 Decision Pending
Feb 22 Accept

Nov 22 Submitted to Journal
Nov 22 Awaiting Editor Decision or Reviewer Confirmation
Nov 23 Under Review
Nov 24 Under Review
Nov 29 Under Review
Dec 06 Under Review
Dec 07 Required Reviews Completed
Dec 09 Required Reviews Completed
Dec 20 Required Reviews Completed
Dec 21 Major Revise
Jan 28 With Editor
Feb 01 Awaiting Editor Decision or Reviewer Confirmation
Feb 03 Under Review
Feb 06 Required Reviews Completed
Feb 16 Required Reviews Completed
Feb 22 Decision Pending
Feb 22 Accept

Posted in October 20, a major revision was done a month later with four reviewers and approximately 50 questions. The number of experiments needed was significantly increased compared to the original version. It took five months to conduct the additional experiments, during which two deadline extensions were requested. After revising the paper, feedback was received again after two weeks, this time with only six questions remaining, but additional experiments were still required. After another month of conducting experiments, the paper was revised and accepted 10 days later. Both the editor-in-chief and the reviewers were very diligent and responsible, raising meaningful points and improving the quality of the paper through the additional experiments. The editor was accommodating, usually approving reasonable extension requests.