NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
NEW J CHEM
ISSN / eISSN
1144-0546 / 1369-9261
Aims and Scope
A journal for new directions in chemistry
Subject Area
CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
5.30
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Chemistry - General Chemistry | Q2 | #141/408 |
Chemistry - Materials Chemistry | Q2 | #112/317 |
Chemistry - Catalysis | Q3 | #40/68 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | Quartile |
---|---|
CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY | Q2 |
H-index
112
Country/Area of Publication
ENGLAND
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry
Publication Frequency
Monthly
Year Publication Started
1987
Annual Article Volume
2153
Open Access
NO
Contact
ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Verified Reviews
On May 3rd, it displayed "with reviewers."
On May 22nd, it displayed that two review comments had been received.
On May 28th, the handling editor emailed feedback on the two review comments, one minor revision and one major revision, and provided the first-round review comments for major revision.
On May 31st, the revised manuscript was submitted, and the same day it displayed "with editor."
On June 3rd, it displayed "with reviewers."
On June 14th, an email response was sent regarding the second-round review comments, and the handling editor provided the final acceptance decision. The publishing editor extended an invitation for the front cover.
Overall, the reviewing process by external experts was relatively fast, with a status of "with editor" lasting for over three weeks. Akhila K. Sahoo, the associate editor, took about a week to select reviewers and evaluate review comments.
Submit: 4.7 (submitted for review within a week, forgot the specific day)
Major revision: 4.24 (the speed of the first review is amazing! Two reviewers, one major revision (12 questions) and one minor revision (5 questions), no need for additional experiments, the editor requested major revision)
Resubmit: 5.16 (I procrastinated too much, my fault, completely neglected it during the May Day holiday, it's too late to say anything now)
Accept: 6.6 (the second review seems to be on May 18th or 19th, I didn't expect the second review to take longer than the first! Both reviewers directly accepted, maybe... the editor went on a Dragon Boat Festival holiday)
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started