MOLECULES AND CELLS

This journal has a circulation of over 10,000 per year, so there is a high possibility of being alerted. I submitted an article in February, which required experimental verification. I responded to questions without providing additional data, and my article was rejected, with the condition that new evidence must be provided. Afterwards, I conducted a double-knockout experiment on cells and resubmitted the manuscript in August. It took about 3 weeks for the review process (mainly because one reviewer was delayed in providing their review). Two reviewers provided feedback and requested a response, which I provided within 5 days. During the period of conducting experiments and supplementing data, the editorial department sent multiple emails inquiring about the progress of data supplementation. I feel that the editorial department is impatient with me.

May I ask if you have selected the fast review channel? I would like to learn some tips from you. You respond so quickly, I am envious.