Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review
MINER PROCESS EXTR M
ISSN / eISSN
0882-7508 / 1547-7401
Aims and Scope
Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review publishes both theoretical and practical papers relevant to technical, economic, and environmental issues in the handling, processing, and utilization of minerals. In addition to regular issues, special issues focusing on subjects of regional and topical significance will be published when the Editor feels there is sufficient interest among readers.
Subject Area
METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING
MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING
CiteScore
10.30
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Engineering - Mechanical Engineering | Q1 | #41/672 |
Engineering - Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology | Q1 | #15/229 |
Engineering - Economic Geology | Q1 | #5/43 |
Engineering - General Chemistry | Q1 | #55/408 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | Quartile |
---|---|
METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING | Q1 |
MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING | Q1 |
H-index
29
Country/Area of Publication
UNITED STATES
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Publication Frequency
Quarterly
Annual Article Volume
55
Open Access
NO
Contact
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 325 CHESTNUT ST, SUITE 800, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19106
Verified Reviews
2022-05-05 reject and resubmit (both reviewers provided positive feedback, but a decision was made to reject and resubmit due to the following reasons)
2022-05-16 resubmit
2022-05-17 reject and resubmit (the editor directly provided the decision: good paper but poor image quality, unclear keywords, and suggested removing most of the images)
2022-05-20 resubmit
2022-05-22 reject (reason: images have high pixel density, exceeding the requirements; it is advised to carefully check before each submission in the future)
Speechless, this journal rejected it solely because of high image resolution, despite receiving positive feedback from the reviewers.
2022.10.3 Rejected (5 reviewers, one of whom gave a rejection)
I am not satisfied and feel that the reviewers did not read my article carefully and rejected it.
2022.10.11 After a thorough revision, resubmitted
2022.10.31 Major revise (2 reviewers, constructive comments)
2022.11.21 Revised submitted (another extensive revision)
2022.11.22 Accepted
Overall, it was a roller coaster ride. The acceptance rate for this journal is only 14%. I feel proud to have been accepted. I would like to express my special thanks to the editor for providing a second chance for review and to all 7 reviewers for their constructive and insightful comments.
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now