MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
MECH SYST SIGNAL PR
ISSN / eISSN
0888-3270 / 1096-1216
Aims and Scope
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (MSSP) is an interdisciplinary journal in Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering with the purpose of reporting scientific advancements of the highest quality arising from new techniques in sensing, instrumentation, signal processing, modelling and control of dynamic systems. MSSP papers are expected to make a demonstrable original contribution to engineering knowledge, which should be significant in terms of advancement over established methods. Especially sought are papers that include both theoretical and experimental aspects, or that include theoretical material of high relevance to practical applications
Subject Area
ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
CiteScore
14.80
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
| Category | Quartile | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering - Aerospace Engineering | Q1 | #3/153 |
| Engineering - Civil and Structural Engineering | Q1 | #9/379 |
| Engineering - Mechanical Engineering | Q1 | #19/672 |
| Engineering - Computer Science Applications | Q1 | #41/817 |
| Engineering - Signal Processing | Q1 | #8/131 |
| Engineering - Control and Systems Engineering | Q1 | #19/321 |
Web of Science Core Collection
| Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
|---|---|
| Indexed | - |
| Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | Quartile |
|---|---|
| ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL | Q1 |
H-index
134
Country/Area of Publication
ENGLAND
Publisher
Academic Press Inc.
Publication Frequency
Bimonthly
Year Publication Started
1987
Annual Article Volume
932
Open Access
NO
Contact
ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON, ENGLAND, NW1 7DX
Verified Reviews
2021.05.22 with editor
2021.05.23 editor invited
2021.05.25 under review
2021.07.12 reviews completed
2021.07.18 major revision
2021.08.03 revised submitted
2021.08.05 editor invited
2021.08.09 under review
2021.09.08 reviews completed
2021.09.13 major revision
2021.09.15 revised submitted
2021.09.16 editor invited
2021.09.18 under review
2021.09.25 minor revision
2021.09.25 revised submitted
2021.09.26 editor invited
2021.09.27 under review
2021.10.06 accept
Translation:
2021.05.18 submitted
2021.05.22 with editor
2021.05.23 editor invited
2021.05.25 under review
2021.07.12 reviews completed
2021.07.18 major revision
2021.08.03 revised submitted
2021.08.05 editor invited
2021.08.09 under review
2021.09.08 reviews completed
2021.09.13 major revision
2021.09.15 revised submitted
2021.09.16 editor invited
2021.09.18 under review
2021.09.25 minor revision
2021.09.25 revised submitted
2021.09.26 editor invited
2021.09.27 under review
2021.10.06 accept
Both reviewers in the first round requested major revisions and gave positive feedback.
When sent back for revisions, Reviewer 1 did not choose to review it again, so the editor reluctantly found other reviewers. One of them gave a few random reasons for rejection.
In June, I followed up with a sense of being rejected, but the editor gave me minor revisions and asked me to carefully address the reviewer's questions.
I provided various references, literature, and theoretical comparisons to refute the reviewer's unreasonable reasons for rejection, and submitted it.
Two days later, the editor directly accepted it. The lesson learned is that if you have innovation, don't be intimidated by reviewers. Have confidence in appealing and editors have insightful judgment.
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started