JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
J CONTROL RELEASE
ISSN / eISSN
0168-3659 / 1873-4995
Aims and Scope
The Journal of Controlled Release (JCR) publishes high-quality research articles in the broad field of delivery science and technology. This includes drug delivery systems and all aspects of formulations, such as physicochemical and biological properties of drugs, design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms, in vivo testing, and formulation research and development in the disciplines of pharmaceutical, diagnostic, agricultural, environmental, cosmetic, and food industries. Manuscripts that advance fundamental understanding of principles and/or demonstrate advantages of novel technologies in safety and efficacy over current clinical standards will be given priority. Each issue has the cover story highlighting the significance of a selected article published in the issue. At the end of each quarter, the JCR editors select "The Editors' Choice" from the published research articles.
Subject Area
CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
18.50
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics - Pharmaceutical Science | Q1 | #3/183 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | Quartile |
---|---|
CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY | Q1 |
PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY | Q1 |
H-index
237
Country/Area of Publication
NETHERLANDS
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Frequency
Semimonthly
Year Publication Started
1984
Annual Article Volume
645
Open Access
NO
Contact
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Verified Reviews
5.22 under review
6.4 review complete
6.5 Deputy Editor rejects the submission, two positive comments and one negative comment, there are more issues in the positive comments, mainly in terms of parameters. The rejection only mentions that it is more suitable for a more specialized journal and does not provide any specific feedback, suspecting that the article was not read. Can only battle it out with the Editor, as the other two reviewers requested revisions for publication. Hoping for a major revision. Sigh.
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreDiscover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversation