CELL TRANSPLANTATION

Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.

Journal Title

CELL TRANSPLANT

ISSN / eISSN

0963-6897 / 1555-3892

Aims and Scope

Cell Transplantation, The Regenerative Medicine Journal is an open access, peer reviewed journal that is published 12 times annually. Cell Transplantation is a multi-disciplinary forum for publication of articles on cell transplantation and its applications to human diseases. Articles focus on a myriad of topics including the physiological, medical, pre-clinical, tissue engineering, stem cell, and device-oriented aspects of the nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular, and endothelial systems, as well as genetically engineered cells. Cell Transplantation also reports on relevant technological advances, clinical studies, and regulatory considerations related to the implantation of cells into the body in order to provide complete coverage of the field.

Subject Area

CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING

MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL

TRANSPLANTATION

CiteScore

6.00

View Trend

CiteScore Ranking

Category	Quartile	Rank
Medicine - Transplantation	Q2	#15/54
Medicine - Biomedical Engineering	Q2	#114/303
Medicine - Cell Biology	Q3	#166/285

Web of Science Core Collection

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)	Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed	-

Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024)	Quartile
CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING	Q3
MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL	Q2
TRANSPLANTATION	Q2

H-index

Country/Area of Publication

UNITED STATES

Publisher

SAGE Publications Inc.

Publication Frequency

Bimonthly

Annual Article Volume

104

Open Access

YES

Contact

COGNIZANT COMMUNICATION CORP, 3 HARTSDALE ROAD, ELMSFORD, USA, NY, 10523-3701

Popular journals in the same field
Recent articles

Verified Reviews

Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

Recently, I was invited to help with reviewing a manuscript. I reviewed it very carefully and provided valuable feedback. It seemed to be a research topic for a graduate student, and I thought it was done quite well. There were some small requests for the author to supplement additional data, which I thought was a pity. However, the second reviewer gave a low rating and recommended reconsideration. I don't know how it will develop from here. Of course, as a reviewer, I am willing to support the author. After all, they have put in a lot of hard work!

2022-06-11

View All Reviews

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started