BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY

There is an international collaborative research article on global extreme precipitation, which has innovative content and good quality. The research findings are also good. I didn't expect the process to be so painful (over two years of time)...........
Submitted to NCC, forgot which month in 2019, rejected within ten days without review, was asked to submit to NC;
Submitted to NC, also not reviewed........, then revised for a month;
Submitted to Science, rejected after a little over two weeks, asked to submit to Science Advances;
Submitted to SA in June 2019, major revision after 8 to 9 months, three reviewers' opinions were mostly positive; returned after three months, and after another four months, additional reviewer comments, all minor issues, no problems with the article, rejection reason was only: data not completely open (no strength to comment)
Submitted abstract to BAMS, editor-in-chief replied after half a month welcoming the submission;
Formally submitted, rejected and resubmitted after three months; revised for three months and submitted again; minor revisions for about two months; returned after one month, accepted in less than a month.

BAMS is also a journal I aspire to. This is the only time I have experienced it. The review speed doesn't feel very fast but it's acceptable; the publishing speed is a bit slow, it has been over two months and there is still no proof........

Teacher Du has read your article, and it's really great work. Well done!