Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science
J OCEAN ENG SCI
ISSN / eISSN
2468-0133 / 2468-0133
Subject Area
ENGINEERING, MARINE
ENGINEERING, OCEAN
CiteScore
11.50
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Engineering - Ocean Engineering | Q1 | #3/105 |
Engineering - Oceanography | Q1 | #4/145 |
Engineering - Environmental Engineering | Q1 | #18/197 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | Quartile |
---|---|
ENGINEERING, MARINE | Q1 |
ENGINEERING, OCEAN | Q1 |
Country/Area of Publication
PEOPLES R CHINA
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Annual Article Volume
50
Open Access
YES
Contact
RADARWEG 29, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1043 NX
Verified Reviews
Overall, this person is only making baseless speculations because his own work got rejected. Why bother with marine engineering? He should just become a detective and focus on solving cases and using his reasoning skills. Instead of blaming domestic journals or achieving success in a short period of time, he should reflect on his own reasons for rejection. It's not good to spread misinformation like this. It seems very low.
1. The impact factor is artificially inflated, with only about 30 articles published each year, but with a high number of self-citations. The editor themselves are responsible for raising the impact factor.
2. It has very low international recognition, as no influential figures submit their articles here. Both domestic and international high-quality research sources are not present in this journal. Instead, it mainly contains papers from countries like Egypt, India, and the Middle East. Therefore, it is suggested that if you have a good article, submit it to OE or AOR.
3. It is best to have a recommendation from the editor or an internal channel for acceptance. Otherwise, it is difficult to get published. Upon careful examination of this journal, it can be seen that many articles are accepted on the same day of submission. Those who understand the situation will know what this implies.
4. The reviewers are not diligent or responsible, as they often dismiss articles with just a few sentences, without providing any helpful feedback for improving the quality of the articles.
5. Personally, I feel that this journal is potentially risky for the future. While it may have a temporarily high impact factor, it is unlikely to be successful in the long run. To truly elevate the journal, the editor needs to sincerely manage it, improve the quality of research sources and reviewers.
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started