Food Science and Human Wellness

Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.

Journal Title

FOOD SCI HUM WELL

ISSN / eISSN

2213-4530 / 2213-4530

Aims and Scope

Food Science and Human Wellness is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the dissemination of the latest scientific results in food science, nutriology, immunology and cross-field research. Articles must present information that is novel, has high impact and interest, and is of high scientific quality. By their effort, it has been developed to promote the public awareness on diet, advocate healthy diet, reduce the harm caused by unreasonable dietary habit, and directs healthy food development for food industrial producers.

Subject Area

FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

NUTRITION & DIETETICS

CiteScore

8.30

View Trend

CiteScore Ranking

Category	Quartile	Rank
Agricultural and Biological Sciences - Food Science	Q1	#46/389

Web of Science Core Collection

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)	Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed	-

Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024)	Quartile
FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY	Q1
NUTRITION & DIETETICS	Q1

Country/Area of Publication

PEOPLES R CHINA

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Frequency

Quarterly

Year Publication Started

2012

Annual Article Volume

233

Open Access

YES

Contact

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS, B605D, XUE YAN BUILDING, BEIJING, PEOPLES R CHINA, 100084

Popular journals in the same field
Recent articles

Verified Reviews

Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

The journal "Food Science and Human Wellness" is quite strange. It was originally a Chinese journal that we fully supported. We even cited articles from this journal when writing our own. However, the recent experience of submitting an article to the journal was very unpleasant. During the first review, three reviewers provided their comments after two months. The suggestions were not significant, so we made the revisions accordingly. Surprisingly, during the second review, two new reviewers were assigned. One of them rejected the article, stating that in vitro experiments cannot represent in vivo results. The editor also rejected it. We wonder why new reviewers were sought during the second review when there were no disagreements in the first review. Additionally, the opinion of the second reviewer was obviously unconvincing, so we question why the editor chose to adopt it. We rarely submit to domestic journals, but we wanted to support them and hoped they would improve. However, this experience was very disappointing. The articles in "Food Science and Human Wellness" also have a significant difference compared to those in "JAFC" and "MNFR." We hope that domestic journals can improve and maintain quality.

2021-03-30

jun 19 submit
jun 27 under review
jul 25 under review
aug 6 under review
sep 23 reviews completed
sep 24 under review
oct 1 under review
oct 4 minor review
nov 4 review back
nov 6 under review
nov 11 under review
nov 21 under review
dec 9 minor review
dec 12 accept

Translation:
June 19 - Submitted
June 27 - Under review
July 25 - Under review
August 6 - Under review
September 23 - Reviews completed
September 24 - Under review
October 1 - Under review
October 4 - Minor review
November 4 - Review completed
November 6 - Under review
November 11 - Under review
November 21 - Under review
December 9 - Minor review
December 12 - Accepted

2022-12-12

View All Reviews

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now