Transportation Geotechnics
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
Transportation Geotechnics
TRANSP GEOTECH
ISSN / eISSN
2214-3912 / 2214-3912
Aims and Scope
Transportation Geotechnics aims to publish high quality, theoretical and applied papers on all aspects of geotechnics for roads, highways, railways, airfields and waterways.
Subject Area
ENGINEERING, CIVIL
ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
CiteScore
8.10
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology | Q1 | #31/229 |
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Civil and Structural Engineering | Q1 | #51/379 |
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Transportation | Q1 | #32/141 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | Quartile |
---|---|
ENGINEERING, CIVIL | Q1 |
ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL | Q1 |
Country/Area of Publication
Netherlands
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Annual Article Volume
233
Open Access
NO
Contact
RADARWEG 29, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1043 NX
Verified Reviews
In October 2021, I submitted a purely experimental article, and it finally went through the review process. However, the review process was very long, and I didn't receive the major revision comments until the end of July this year. There were three reviewers who provided approximately 20 comments, and they were all very professional.
On September 14th, I submitted the revised comments, and after more than ten days of review, there was no need for a second revision. The article was directly accepted, taking a total of about 11 months.
The overall quality of the journal paper is good, but the review speed is average, and there may be a certain rejection rate.
PS: The impact factor has risen rapidly this year, showing great potential.
The first-time experience of submitting to this journal was not very good. I submitted on January 28th and was in communication with the editor until February 23rd. They directly mentioned that the scope did not match, which wasted time. The editor-in-chief, Professor Erol Tutumluer from UIUC, is really slow in handling the process. In the short term, I don't think I will consider this journal again for my research outcomes.
Wishing everyone good luck...
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started