ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
ISPRS INT J GEO-INF
ISSN / eISSN
2220-9964 / 2220-9964
Aims and Scope
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (ISSN 2220-9964) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of geographic information. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information publishes regular research papers, reviews and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
The 2018 IJGI Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJGI. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijgi/awards.
The 2018 IJGI Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJGI. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijgi/awards.
Subject Area
GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
REMOTE SENSING
CiteScore
6.90
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences - Geography, Planning and Development | Q1 | #92/821 |
Social Sciences - Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) | Q1 | #20/159 |
Social Sciences - Computers in Earth Sciences | Q1 | #16/73 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | Quartile |
---|---|
COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS | Q2 |
GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL | Q2 |
REMOTE SENSING | Q2 |
H-index
25
Country/Area of Publication
SWITZERLAND
Publisher
MDPI (Basel, Switzerland)
Year Publication Started
2012
Annual Article Volume
499
Open Access
YES
Contact
ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, BASEL, SWITZERLAND, CH-4052
Verified Reviews
9.25 Assignment to editor
10.28 Editor notified of major revisions, three reviewers, one with fewer comments, two with more comments, but all affirming the content of the paper, given ten days for revisions, resubmission after seven days
11.11 Editor notified of second round of reviewer comments, still requiring major revisions, given fourteen days, two reviewers accept, third reviewer has many comments, including suggestions for paper structure and content, made modifications based on each comment, felt that the paper was greatly strengthened, polished under MDPI, resubmission after six days
11.17 Third reviewer is generally satisfied with the modifications, minor revisions requested, submitted after one day
11.27 Acceptance
12.6 Publication
Overall, the journal has certain requirements for the innovation of the paper. The three reviewers, experienced experts in the field, were very meticulous in the review process, and all their comments were critical. However, the review process was fast, so if there is an urgent need for publication, it can be considered for submission.
2022.1.3 Received notice of major revisions, one positive, one neutral, and one negative. The positive reviewer passed it directly, while the neutral reviewer raised many detailed questions about a specific chapter, which I did not anticipate having different interpretations. So I made thorough revisions. The final negative reviewer's comments were very subjective and did not mention any specific issues, only stating that the article's description was unclear. However, after careful modifications, I resubmitted it.
2022.1.17 Returned with major revisions.
2022.1.19 Minor revisions. The neutral reviewer had a few remaining unclear questions, so I explained and resubmitted it.
2022.1.25 Accepted.
2022.1.26 Returned with proofreading modifications.
2022.1.26 Pending conversion and conversion skipped.
Overall, it is not bad. Some of the comments are even better than those from some good journals. This version had the most changes I made and I am quite satisfied.
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started