Join the Reviewer Roulette Hub
Share your experience with a Peer Review Champion or Peer Review Antagonist. Select the category that best describes your experience, and then provide the quote, context, and the journal you submitted to. Please refrain from publishing any personal information, including names or email addresses.
Peer Review Antagonist Mean-spirited
Although this study is considered a pilot trial, the small number of patients 12 divided into 4 groups is a serious flaw in methodology. The interpret...
- Comment from F1000 Research reviewer
Peer Review Champion Thought-provoking
This manuscript is a herculean effort and enjoyable read. I learned lots, (and I think the paper will be a good resource for anybody interested in the...
- Comment from F1000 Research reviewer
Peer Review Antagonist Confusing
It is quite unclear what the focus of this study is because the primary outcome is basically a rise in patients screened and given advice. It should...
- Comment from F1000 Research reviewer
Peer Review Champion Constructive
As the study identified different sets of factors associated with HT and Pre-HT in the two separate logistic regression models, I would suggest conduc...
- Comment from F1000 Research reviewer
Peer Review Antagonist Mean-spirited
The authors provide absolutely no information of how the samples were collected and how the DNA was prepared. Given that the authors in their gap anal...
- Comment from F1000 Research reviewer
Peer Review Champion Positive
All data sets are presented, accompanied by R codes, which have made the replication and reproduction of the results both easy and transparent. Having...
- Comment from F1000 Research reviewer