![](https://peeref-open.s3.amazonaws.com/storage/images/banners/stock_img_75.jpg)
Join the Reviewer Roulette Hub
Share your experience with a Peer Review Champion or Peer Review Antagonist. Select the category that best describes your experience, and then provide the quote, context, and the journal you submitted to. Please refrain from publishing any personal information, including names or email addresses.
Peer Review Antagonist Confusing
I, Dr. Imtiaz-ud-Din, as the corresponding author intend to share a comment about a manuscript recently submitted to an RSC journal that was initially...
- Comment from New Journal of Chemistry reviewer
Peer Review Antagonist Confusing
Dear Authors 1 This paper is written well However, the author should compare the research results to other works related to this topic in the results-...
- Comment from Optik: International Journal for Light and El... reviewer
Peer Review Antagonist Confusing
Because several reviewers in different rounds of review pointed out there is no strong proofs to support your claims, the revision seems cannot be com...
- Comment from IEEE Sensors reviewer
Peer Review Antagonist Confusing
The present study sheds light into thermally activated AS Raman emission triggered by plasmon absorption... Overall, the work is really interesting, b...
- Comment from ACS Photonics reviewer
Peer Review Antagonist Confusing
It is quite unclear what the focus of this study is because the primary outcome is basically a rise in patients screened and given advice. It should...
- Comment from F1000 Research reviewer