Very interesting to focus on domains and delivery of activities in a way that an individual can enjoy and have the self-efficacy and confidence. The recommendations can help practitioners to optimize activities and mental health outcomes.
Here is a paper to counter toxicity: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018364722000465
This reviews therapies through natural resources and nanotech to treat heavy metal toxicity.
Interesting findings and makes sense seeing the mothers have these discussions. As the future research needs states, I would be curious to see the father contributions and how that is valued compared to mothers. A variety of variables would be considered to assess influence further.
I was exposed to this game recently and the story line was very interesting and tapping into things we do not typically see. It is all very complex, but I did not get a chance to go further.
Social determinants of health is so important to know about for providers as they can be aware of community health issues and being aware of resources to refer to.
I have never seen this study design in which collaboration happens to push policy. We certainly see research that tries to inform for policy, but I like the use of working groups to look into research and how to improve disparities and the policies for PAP insurance coverage.
Good information for people that do not have an extensive background in this area as well. It is interesting to see the clinical trials for development of new therapies.
This can take on a multidisciplinary approach where collaboration is important with education to increase understanding and responding to the crisis. It is good to see the data as well. It is eye-opening to see the lack of drug development, but the need is there to have new approaches and have the best practices.
Article